Bug 104755

Summary:	Missing OpenOffice.org related packages in selections
Product:	[openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0	Reporter:	Petr Mladek <pmladek>
Component:	Selections	Assignee:	Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:	E-mail List <qa-bugs>
Severity:	Normal
Priority:	P2 - High
Version:	Beta 1
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	SUSE Other
Whiteboard:
Found By:	Development	Services Priority:
Business Priority:		Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---	IT Deployment:	---
Attachments:	This patch adds entries for languages that already are supported somewhere in the selectio package This patch adds entries for languages that has not had entries in the package selectio yet.

Description Petr Mladek 2005-08-15 17:43:06 UTC

Hi Stefan,

I have checked the package selectio for missing (new) OpenOffice_org
localizations and dictionaries. I prepared two patches. The first one adds
entries for languages that were already used somewhere in the selectio package
(there already are packages in a selection for these languages). The second one
adds entries for languages that were not used in any other selection (this is
the first special selection for such languages).

The result is that all OOo localizations are in a selection but not all myspell
dictionaries are in a selection. This is because I added dictionaries just for
languages that are more supported by SUSE. This means that we either have a
related OOo localization or we have another packages localized to this language.
For example, we have Malay localization of WindowMaker, xmms, coreutils, ..., so
I created a selection for myspell-malay. But we do not have any package
localized into Kurdish, so I did not created a selection for myspell-kurdish.

I am not sure what with the dictionaries like myspell-australian,
myspell-austrian, or myspell-nswiss that are derived from other languages
(usually English, German)? Should we create extra selection for such languages or ?

Finally, I found that myspell-american and myspell-british are repeated in each,
selection/lang_add/OFFICE/* selection. I would move these entries to
selection/data/OFFICE. It is correct because these dictioanries are
required by the main package OpenOffice_org and it is in selection/data/OFFICE.

What do you think about it?

Could you update the selectio package? (I could do it myself if you approve the
changes)

Comment 1 Petr Mladek 2005-08-15 17:44:56 UTC

Created attachment 46087 [details]
This patch adds entries for languages that already are supported somewhere in the selectio package

Comment 2 Petr Mladek 2005-08-15 17:46:11 UTC

Created attachment 46088 [details]
This patch adds entries for languages that has not had entries in the package selectio yet.

Comment 3 Stefan Dirsch 2005-08-17 10:38:19 UTC

Thanks. I'll apply your patches. Some comments below.

> I am not sure what with the dictionaries like myspell-australian,
> myspell-austrian, or myspell-nswiss that are derived from other languages
> (usually English, German)? Should we create extra selection for such 
> languages or ?

I vote against a (new) language selection.

> Finally, I found that myspell-american and myspell-british are repeated in
> each, selection/lang_add/OFFICE/* selection. I would move these entries to
> selection/data/OFFICE. It is correct because these dictioanries are
> required by the main package OpenOffice_org and it is in 
> selection/data/OFFICE.

I'll do so.

Comment 4 Stefan Dirsch 2005-08-17 10:57:39 UTC

fixed for Beta3.