|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | problems with various packages | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 | Reporter: | Marco Michna <mmichna> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | Carsten Hoeger <choeger> |
| Status: | VERIFIED INVALID | QA Contact: | Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf> |
| Severity: | Minor | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | gnome-bugs, lslezak, mls, schubi |
| Version: | Beta 2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | SUSE Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Component Test | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 97395 | ||
|
Description
Marco Michna
2005-08-19 11:32:13 UTC
Wrong assignee? Is this a Round Robin bug? Ok, first aaa_skel -> ro. jsuchome said: it's a problem of package maintainers in such case. Or did he mean the package maintainer of every single package? Arvin is right, it's round robin. maintainer of aaa_skel: ro@suse.de maintainer of at: ro@suse.de maintainer of gettext: mmj@suse.de maintainer of gnome-filesystem: gnome-maintainers@suse.de maintainer of groff: mfabian@suse.de maintainer of perl: mls@suse.de maintainer of perl-Digest-SHA1: mjancar@suse.cz maintainer of perl-gettext: schubi@suse.de maintainer of postfix: choeger@suse.de maintainer of util-linux: mmj@suse.de maintainer of yast2-sound: lslezak@suse.cz Verifying fresh installed package should not report errors. Fixed for groff. What does "..?....." mean ? I have not found this flag in the docu. ? means "unknown", i.e. read/readlink failed. rpm seems to have a bug as it complains if a file is zero bytes big (the mmap fails with EINVAL). I'm not sure, whether I understand this bug. Anyway. When I run rpm -V postfix as user, I get this output: +/~ $ rpm -V postfix S.5....T c /etc/postfix/main.cf ..?..... c /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd ..?..... c /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf missing /var/adm/backup/postfix missing /var/adm/backup/postfix/main.cf missing /var/adm/backup/postfix/master.cf And when I run it as root: hurwitz:~ # rpm -V postfix S.5....T c /etc/postfix/main.cf So what's the bug? No bug for you. Be happy ;-) yast2-sound - the problem is also in rpm itself, the file which fails during verification test has zero size. In Beta1 rpm doesn't complain. Different kernel, I guess. But it is a rpm bug, it tries to mmap a zero size file. Please ignore all '?' entries that are caused by this. reassigning to next in list (please remember that the ? problems are not caused by the package, we are tracking this bug for other output of rpm -V) anyway: "rpm -V " needs to be called as root for useful output. Then, the package perl-gettext has no bug;-) fixed for util-linux "rpm -V gnome-filesystem" seems happy on my test machines here. Maybe some other script modified something? Hard to say without further details, without which I'm going to assume that gnome-filesystem doesn't have a real problem. The .bs in perl modules are not a bug, reassigning to next affected package maintainer. yast2-sound is also OK The remaining packages: # rpm -V util-linux .M...... g /var/lib/nfs/state # rpm -V postfix S.5....T c /etc/postfix/main.cf S.5....T c /etc/postfix/master.cf Henne already fixed it. So is all the affected ones fixed? This is a good example why there should be only 1 bug pr. bugreport. So the only package which remains is postfix. (I agree, it's a mess. Such bugreports should be splitted into more parts.) ? Okay, Adrian explained to me in #suse, what this bug seems to be about. I assume, that you don't want rpm -V to report ANYTHING after a fresh installation? Then, this bug is INVALID for postfix, because I need at least to set a valid FQHN in main.cf in order to be able to start it (that's because SUSE LINUX gethostname() function only returns the hostpart of the fqdn). all the files 'rpm -V postfix' complains about are config files, so you're ok. (Do not add %verify() to config files!) Don't worry, I did not plan to do so... :-) |