|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | APM resume fails on Toshiba Portege 3480 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 | Reporter: | Harald Koenig <koenig> |
| Component: | Kernel | Assignee: | Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x <forgotten_ZhJd0F0L3x> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | kukuk |
| Version: | Beta 3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i586 | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: |
LUT dumps
10.0 SR1B = 0x18 LUT dump LUT dump |
||
|
Description
Harald Koenig
2005-08-29 11:46:06 UTC
Do you use the savagefb kernel module? Does removing this module helps? yes, probably a duplicate of bug #113607 Created attachment 48491 [details]
LUT dumps
Created attachment 48492 [details]
10.0 SR1B = 0x18
Created attachment 48493 [details]
LUT dump
Created attachment 48494 [details]
LUT dump
(In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=48491) [edit] > LUT dumps sorry for those 4 attachments, they should have gone to bug #113810 which I just replied to. no idea how I managed to change the big id underneath :-( (In reply to comment #1) > Do you use the savagefb kernel module? > Does removing this module helps? sorry for the delay! pasting my mail reply from 29 Aug 2005 14:25:36.... did I mention that I hate bugzilla ?? :-(( correct. I just found report #113296 and wrote a comment there: renaming the savagefb and rebooting fixed my APM problem. now resume after "apm -s" works again. thanks!! but why does this module get loaded at all ?? I'm booting with "vga=normal" because I'd like to stay with 80x25 plain text mode... bug #113607 is a bug - these modules should not be loaded (they also should not kill suspend, but this is another story). BTW i'd recommend using "powersave -m" (APM Standby) "powersave -u" (APM Suspend) "powersave -U" (swsusp suspend to disk) over "apm -s" and friends. Those should work (they just trigger an event in the kernel which in turn triggers powersaved) but this is mostly untested. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 113607 *** (In reply to comment #9) > BTW i'd recommend using > "powersave -m" (APM Standby) > "powersave -u" (APM Suspend) > "powersave -U" (swsusp suspend to disk) > over "apm -s" and friends. Those should work (they just trigger an event in the > kernel which in turn triggers powersaved) but this is mostly untested. since using ACPI, I can't use "apm -s" anymore: harald:~ # apm -s No APM support in kernel I've seen your recommendation before, but how can/shall apm work with ACPI enabled (and thus APM disabled) ? up to 9.3 I only could use APM -- ACPI didn't work. so I had no choice, I only could use APM and "apm -s"... thanks! powersave always worked with APM and ACPI. Thats the whole purpose of powersaved - giving a unified solution / frontendd. |