Bug 114030

Summary: glibc/ld- versions
Product: [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 Reporter: Andreas Jaeger <aj>
Component: AppArmorAssignee: Seth R Arnold <seth.arnold>
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX QA Contact: Keiran Haggerty <khaggerty>
Severity: Normal    
Priority: P5 - None    
Version: Beta 3   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: Other   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Found By: Other Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---

Description Andreas Jaeger 2005-08-30 07:26:57 UTC 
It seems to me that ld-lsb.so.2 and ld-lsb.so.3 are missing in the list.

Also, there are far too many glibc versions handled.  Ok, they do not cost us
anything but I would remove some really old versions if possible.
Comment 1 Dominic W Reynolds 2005-08-31 03:19:12 UTC 
Seth: can we add these profiles to the default ld-<SPLAT> set?
Comment 2 Seth R Arnold 2005-08-31 05:44:55 UTC 
Andreas, are there platforms where ld-lsb.so.2 and ld-lsb.so.3 aren't symlinks?
AppArmor doesn't use the symlink name when deciding which profile to apply, so
unless they aren't symlinks somewhere, those profiles would never be applied.

Removing the older loaders is a good idea. 80+ profiles loaded seems a bit silly
when so many are blank. :)

Thanks
Comment 3 Andreas Jaeger 2005-08-31 06:29:02 UTC 
There're current no platforms where ld-lsb.so.2 is not a symlink but this is an
implementation detail that might change.