|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | hwinfo should create another section 'chrp-model' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Patrick Kirsch <pkirsch> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | Steffen Winterfeldt <snwint> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Critical | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | peter, suse-beta |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | Beta 2 | ||
| Hardware: | PowerPC | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: |
maple system information
pegasos2 system information model.txt hwinfo.ppc-system_type.patch |
||
|
Description
Patrick Kirsch
2005-09-06 13:45:24 UTC
Created attachment 48922 [details]
maple system information
Created attachment 48923 [details]
pegasos2 system information
Created attachment 48924 [details]
model.txt
this is a list of older macs, the string can contain spaces (but that violates
the spec), it contains only one line. Unlike the 'compatible' property which
can be multiline.
Please add getsysinfo from a maple machine, too. well, at this moment, i can not provide this information, because the maple-d 100 board does not boot because of corrupted nvram image. We have to wait for full documentaion for this board to fix this. cant you just unconditionally export /proc/device-tree/model in hwinfo --sys? Sure I can. But who is going to use it? /usr/share/YaST2/modules/Arch.ycp will define a board_pegasos and board_maple once we have the model info. both are chrp. pegasos needs amiga partition table maple needs to be mapped to chrp. its required for cell. Steffen, this one became critical for us (Cell support) meanwhile, can you do it now? I will add nothing until after 10.1 is final. BTW, This is an 'enhancement', not 'critical'. *** Bug 191492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** hardly an enhancement... Is this critical as in 'yes, we desperately need it for SP1' or as in 'uh-oh, we're gonna die unless it's in 10.2'? we need it by Friday because other stuff depends on it. Created attachment 98987 [details]
hwinfo.ppc-system_type.patch
could have worked this way
but it was fixed in another way *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 192957 *** |