|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | hostname should be set to FQDN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 | Reporter: | Peter Bowen <pzb> |
| Component: | Basesystem | Assignee: | Dr. Werner Fink <werner> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | kukuk |
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Peter Bowen
2005-09-15 23:46:41 UTC
I know that Red Hat is doing that, but not other systems like Solaris. As the manual page also explicitly states is, that there are different names. And POSIX itself does not say anything about if you should use FQDN or only the pure hostname. Setting the FQDN like Red Hat is doing breaks some protocols like SecureRPC and NIS+. Next point is that the local hostname is not always the FQDN. With two different networks may have tow different Full Quallified Domain Names. Combined with NIS/NIS+/YP you get also some more Names for YP which may not the same as the DNS names. At least you may choose some alias names within one domain and on one of those are identical with the local host name. IMHO it is a BUG to set the local hostname to FQDN |