Bug 119103

Summary: CD-RW drive appears twice in CD-ROM configuration list
Product: [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 Reporter: Ulrich Derenthal <uli.2001>
Component: YaST2Assignee: E-mail List <bnc-team-screening>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf>
Severity: Normal    
Priority: P5 - None    
Version: RC 1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: x86   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Found By: Other Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---
Attachments: relevant part of y2log when configuring CD-ROM drive

Description Ulrich Derenthal 2005-09-27 20:32:53 UTC
When I try to configure my CD drive, it appears twice (both with /dev/hdg and
name LITE-ON LTR-48125W) in the list of detected devices.
Comment 1 Martin Lasarsch 2005-09-28 10:05:40 UTC
please provide more information: 
 
hwinfo --cdrom 
/var/log/YaST2/y2log after configure with YaST2 
Comment 2 Ulrich Derenthal 2005-09-29 18:27:54 UTC
Created attachment 51170 [details]
relevant part of y2log when configuring CD-ROM drive

hwinfo --cdrom

19: IDE 06.0: 10602 CD-ROM (CD-RW)
  [Created at block.192]
  UDI: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/storage_model_LITE_ON_LTR_48125W
  Unique ID: _jAI.DRKEoRFhcl7
  Parent ID: +Y+h.mcsZ0a690T4
  SysFS ID: /block/hdg
  SysFS BusID: 3.0
  SysFS Device Link: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:11.1/ide3/3.0
  Hardware Class: cdrom
  Model: "LITE-ON LTR-48125W"
  Vendor: "LITE-ON"
  Device: "LTR-48125W"
  Revision: "VS0B"
  Serial ID: ""
  Driver: "VIA_IDE", "ide-cdrom", "ide-cdrom"
  Device File: /dev/hdg
  Device Files: /dev/hdg, /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:11.1-ide-1:0
  Device Number: block 34:0
  Features: CD-R, CD-RW
  Size: 1346612 sectors a 512 bytes
  Config Status: cfg=no, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown
  Attached to: #8 (IDE interface)
  Drive Speed: 40
  Volume ID: "SU1000.004"
  Application: "SuSE-Linux-CD-OSS-i386-10.0#0"
  Publisher: "Novell, Inc."
  Preparer: "CD-Team, http://www.suse.de/feedback"
  Creation date: "2005090717115100"
Comment 3 Martin Lasarsch 2005-09-30 09:27:28 UTC
this might be a duplicate of #118673, see comment #12. 
 
If not, please reopen this bug. 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 118673 ***