|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | m4 warnings with FLAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 | Reporter: | Jan Engelhardt <jengelh> |
| Component: | Development | Assignee: | Takashi Iwai <tiwai> |
| Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Minor | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | ||
| Version: | RC 4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Beta-Customer | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | fix | ||
|
Description
Jan Engelhardt
2005-10-01 13:57:26 UTC
Created attachment 51297 [details]
fix
These files belong to the flac package (which you could have found out by using pin), therefore assigning to flac maintainer. No, the m4 files in flac package are all correct. I don't see any package name in the original post, but it must have its own m4 files. Takashi, if you look at the attachment, you'll see that the it changes aclocal/libFLAC++.m4, aclocal/libFLAC.m4 and aclocal/libOggFLAC++.m4 which are all part of the flac-devel package and you're the maintainer. If you believe flac-devel to be OK, close this bug. Yes, as written, flac package itself is OK. Closed as WORKSFORME. Hmpf. Well, the patch is integrated in 10.3, so done. |