|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Bootsplash: suboptimal location of /lib/bootsplash/control for diskless clients | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Forgotten User abccHJSkz0 <forgotten_abccHJSkz0> |
| Component: | Basesystem | Assignee: | Michael Schröder <mls> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | ||
| Version: | Beta 6 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Forgotten User abccHJSkz0
2005-10-03 13:33:46 UTC
Formerly it was in /var, I had to move it out because it has to work if /var is not yet mounted. So only /dev remains. I have to check with the FHS guys if /dev is ok with them... OK got the problem! /dev would definitely better :-) and should be available just from the beginning of the boot procedure ... Thanks!! Dirk Actually the named pipe won't be there if /dev/ is tmpfs and populated by udev... Yes, but other processes devices have that problem too. There are still modules which do not generate the hint for udev to produce a certain dev entry. I would agree on /tmp too for that pipe. But I think /lib, /usr, /opt or such directories are not meant for such files which should be writeable on the local system ... Still located in /lib/bootsplash (SuSE 10.1b6) :-(( Yeah, I don't like dev because of udev. How about /etc? Nah. Will use /dev. Hi! /etc is much more convenient, but probably not the optimal place, /dev would be fine with me :-) It's now in /dev (and will hopefilly stay there). |