|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | [doc] Issue in "Disk partitions" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] PUBLIC SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Reporter: | Jochen Roeder <jochen.roeder> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Amrita Sakthivel <amrita.sakthivel> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Frank Sundermeyer <fs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | fbui, tbazant |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | https://jira.suse.com/browse/DOCTEAM-1072 | ||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Jochen Roeder
2023-06-29 10:05:31 UTC
Thank you for reporting this bug! It is being tracked and processed as part of our queue. Franc and Jochen, From the doc perspective , Will removing "/usr" from the existing statement: Servers should have separate file systems for at least /, /boot, /usr, /var, /tmp, and /home. Do I need to add a statement that " a separate FS for /usr is not supported only when /usr is pre-mounted "? Cover the scope of this bz I think that simply dropping "/usr" from "Server should have separate [...]" sentence is enough. The paragraph https://documentation.suse.com/de-de/sles/15-SP5/html/SLES-all/sec-sec-file-management.html#sec-sec-prot-general-partitions is an overview of the disk layout. I don't think it should mention the specific (and rare) case where /usr should be separated from /. Thanks Franc, I assume this is applicable for for SLES 15 SP5-SP1 Merged into main and SLE15 SP5-1 |