Bug 1213315

Summary:	[doc] Issue in "SUPPORTED SCENARIOS FOR HADR PROVIDER HOOK SCRIPTS"
Product:	[Non-product-specific documentation] Documentation	Reporter:	Fabian Herschel <fabian.herschel>
Component:	SLE Family	Assignee:	Tahlia Richardson <tahlia.richardson>
Status:	IN_PROGRESS ---	QA Contact:	Tanja Roth <taroth>
Severity:	Normal
Priority:	P5 - None	CC:	fabian.herschel, lars.pinne, tahlia.richardson
Version:	unspecified	Flags:	tahlia.richardson: needinfo? (lars.pinne)
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	Other
OS:	Other
Whiteboard:	https://jira.suse.com/browse/DOCTEAM-1046
Found By:	---	Services Priority:
Business Priority:		Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---	IT Deployment:	---

Description Fabian Herschel 2023-07-14 08:33:01 UTC

SUPPORTED SCENARIOS FOR HADR PROVIDER HOOK SCRIPTS:

https://documentation.suse.com/sles-sap/sap-ha-support/single-html/sap-ha-support/#table-sap-ha-solutions-sap-hana-hook-scripts

Tablular for the SAPHanaSR Hooks should be revised.

a) SAPHanaSR.py (Scale-Out) is needed for ALL SAP HANA versions which did not
   provide a SITE Name of the changing SR status. If I remember correctly thia is  
   all versions before SAP HANA 2.0 SPS03 (will review that in the SAP docu); so 
   SAP HANA 1.0 is not correct here ot at least misleading.

b) we should split Scale-Out into "with SAP HANA auto host failover" and "without SAP HANA auto host failover" That is more scanario centered and makes it easier to catch the correct option.

Comment 1 Tahlia Richardson 2023-07-17 07:44:04 UTC

Thanks Fabian, I'll look into it.

Comment 2 Fabian Herschel 2023-07-17 08:48:42 UTC

If needed we could also communicate via E-Mail or via teams about the details.

Comment 3 Tahlia Richardson 2023-08-04 05:36:32 UTC

Hi Fabian, sorry for the delay here. 

(In reply to Fabian Herschel from comment #0)
> a) SAPHanaSR.py (Scale-Out) is needed for ALL SAP HANA versions which did not
>    provide a SITE Name of the changing SR status. If I remember correctly
> thia is  
>    all versions before SAP HANA 2.0 SPS03 (will review that in the SAP
> docu); so 
>    SAP HANA 1.0 is not correct here ot at least misleading.

IIUC, for this I just need to change "Legacy (mandatory for SAP HANA 1.0)" to "Legacy (mandatory for SAP HANA 1.0 and SAP HANA 2.0 SPS02 and earlier)"?

> b) we should split Scale-Out into "with SAP HANA auto host failover" and
> "without SAP HANA auto host failover" That is more scanario centered and
> makes it easier to catch the correct option.

Splitting Scale-Out into two columns is easy enough. For each column, what would the entries for each row need to be?

Comment 4 Tahlia Richardson 2023-08-18 05:07:34 UTC

> > a) SAPHanaSR.py (Scale-Out) is needed for ALL SAP HANA versions which did not
> >    provide a SITE Name of the changing SR status. If I remember correctly
> > thia is  
> >    all versions before SAP HANA 2.0 SPS03 (will review that in the SAP
> > docu); so 
> >    SAP HANA 1.0 is not correct here ot at least misleading.
> 
> IIUC, for this I just need to change "Legacy (mandatory for SAP HANA 1.0)"
> to "Legacy (mandatory for SAP HANA 1.0 and SAP HANA 2.0 SPS02 and earlier)"?

Or maybe this is better: "Mandatory for all versions before SAP HANA 2.0 SPS03"

Comment 5 Fabian Herschel 2023-08-23 10:05:41 UTC

(In reply to Tahlia Richardson from comment #4)
> > > a) SAPHanaSR.py (Scale-Out) is needed for ALL SAP HANA versions which did not
> > >    provide a SITE Name of the changing SR status. If I remember correctly
> > > thia is  
> > >    all versions before SAP HANA 2.0 SPS03 (will review that in the SAP
> > > docu); so 
> > >    SAP HANA 1.0 is not correct here ot at least misleading.
> > 
> > IIUC, for this I just need to change "Legacy (mandatory for SAP HANA 1.0)"
> > to "Legacy (mandatory for SAP HANA 1.0 and SAP HANA 2.0 SPS02 and earlier)"?
> 
> Or maybe this is better: "Mandatory for all versions before SAP HANA 2.0
> SPS03"

I think this is the better solution.

Comment 6 Lars Pinne 2024-01-11 09:21:03 UTC

Hi Tahlia,
is this still open?
Regards,
Lars

Comment 7 Tahlia Richardson 2024-01-12 00:10:29 UTC

(In reply to Lars Pinne from comment #6)
> Hi Tahlia,
> is this still open?
> Regards,
> Lars

Hi Lars, yes it is. I still need the following info: 

(In reply to Tahlia Richardson from comment #3)
...
> > b) we should split Scale-Out into "with SAP HANA auto host failover" and
> > "without SAP HANA auto host failover" That is more scanario centered and
> > makes it easier to catch the correct option.
> 
> Splitting Scale-Out into two columns is easy enough. For each column, what
> would the entries for each row need to be?