|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | libvpl2-2023 not found | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE Tumbleweed | Reporter: | Chase Steenbock <chase> |
| Component: | X11 Applications | Assignee: | E-mail List <screening-team-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Major | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | Andreas.Stieger, chase, hp.jansen, hpj, sndirsch |
| Version: | Current | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | openSUSE Tumbleweed | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Chase Steenbock
2024-02-09 05:50:53 UTC
Breaking change: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1140080 > -Version: 2023.4.0 > +Version: 2.10.1 $ zypper vcmp 2023.4.0 2.10.1 2023.4.0 is newer than 2.10.1 Workaround: zypper dup --allow-downgrade (In reply to Chase Steenbock from comment #0) > Here is the message from Discover: > > File './x86_64/libvpl2-2023.4.0-1.1.x86_64.rpm' not found on medium > 'https://download.opensuse.org/tumbleweed/repo/oss/' I think a 'zypper ref' helps here (In reply to Andreas Stieger from comment #1) > Breaking change: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1140080 > > > -Version: 2023.4.0 > > +Version: 2.10.1 > > $ zypper vcmp 2023.4.0 2.10.1 > 2023.4.0 is newer than 2.10.1 > > Workaround: zypper dup --allow-downgrade And how should I handle this better. Use 2023.4.0.2.10.1 or rename the package to libvpl21, which also would be wrong? (In reply to Stefan Dirsch from comment #3) [...] or rename the package to libvpl21, which also would be wrong? And add the appropriate Provides/Obsoletes of course. If anybody has a proposal which improves the situation, please speak up! But for now I set this to WONTFIX. FTR: https://github.com/intel/libvpl/releases The upstream version went "backwards". Urgh! Let's call this upstream madness! As Stefan noted already, if somebody knows a better way how to handle this, let us know! What happens, if we add a Provides/Obsoletes with a fixed version of 2023.4.0? (In reply to Hans-Peter Jansen from comment #6) > What happens, if we add a Provides/Obsoletes with a fixed version of > 2023.4.0? Don't know ... We don't use/support RPM's epoch. zypper can do downgrades fine, I think the root cause for the bug report was "zypper ref", the version downgrade is a coincidence. So should I run `zypper dup --allow-downgrade` to get around this and submit an issue in the libvpl repo? (In reply to Chase Steenbock from comment #9) > So should I run `zypper dup --allow-downgrade` to get around this and submit > an issue in the libvpl repo? Looks like zypper ref followed by zypper dup --allow-downgrade did the trick. Thank you all for your time and I apologize if I submitted a bug report erroneously. |