Bug 1225786

Summary: software.o.o not fully functional and/or reliable
Product: [openSUSE] openSUSE.org Reporter: Gunner Gewiß <Gunner.Gewiss>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Frank Sundermeyer <fs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Adrian Schröter <adrian.schroeter>
Severity: Normal    
Priority: P5 - None CC: tbazant
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Found By: --- Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---

Description Gunner Gewiß 2024-06-01 12:20:42 UTC 
Hello!

I sometimes use "software.o.o" <https://software.opensuse.org/>. I would like to note that it's not fully functional and/or reliable…

Issue: when you search "firefox" and look up details for "Firefox Web Browser" <https://software.opensuse.org/package/MozillaFirefox> it shows only (and just this one) the official build for Tumbleweed, but no official build for Leap (whatever what version of Leap) and even no "experimental packages" (official OBS — not home OBS!) for Leap (whatever what version of Leap). But as <https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/mozilla> clearly shows, there is an official offer. This issues holds for several packages (I don't have collected all examples I have noticed so far, but they are a few, indeed).

This is somehow annoying… I like to use Leap (not Tumbleweed or Slowroll), but often the package for Leap is not listed (official build (i.e. distribution) or (official) experimental build (i.e. official OBS — not home OBS).

Workaround: what often helps me, is looking up the info for Tumbleweed and then adapt it to Leap. But well…
Comment 1 hui 2024-06-01 19:30:36 UTC 
Old problem...dup
bug 1188365
Comment 2 Gunner Gewiß 2024-06-01 20:28:44 UTC 
Oh, OK. Sorry for posting the dup.

But as you refer to the dup: it is quite old now. And the last comment there is also even quite old. Is there some work going on to fix this issue? Just asking.
Comment 3 Tomáš Bažant 2024-06-07 10:39:56 UTC 
marking as duplicate

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1188365 ***