| Summary: |
VUL-0: CVE-2024-40998: kernel: ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super() |
| Product: |
[Novell Products] SUSE Security Incidents
|
Reporter: |
SMASH SMASH <smash_bz> |
| Component: |
Incidents | Assignee: |
Kernel Bugs <kernel-bugs> |
| Status: |
NEW
---
|
QA Contact: |
Security Team bot <security-team> |
| Severity: |
Normal
|
|
|
| Priority: |
P3 - Medium
|
CC: |
camila.matos
|
| Version: |
unspecified | |
|
| Target Milestone: |
--- | |
|
| Hardware: |
Other | |
|
| OS: |
Other | |
|
| URL: |
https://smash.suse.de/issue/413925/
|
| Whiteboard: |
CVSSv3.1:SUSE:CVE-2024-40998:5.5:(AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) |
|
Found By:
|
Security Response Team
|
Services Priority:
|
|
|---|
|
Business Priority:
|
|
Blocker:
|
---
|
|---|
|
Marketing QA Status:
|
---
|
IT Deployment:
|
---
|
|---|
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super() In the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock: ext4_fill_super ext4_register_sysfs // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms // Other processes modify rs->interval to // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms ext4_orphan_cleanup ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "Errors on filesystem, " __ext4_msg ___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state) if (!rs->interval) // do nothing if interval is 0 return 1; raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags) raw_spin_trylock(lock) _raw_spin_trylock __raw_spin_trylock spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_) lock_acquire __lock_acquire register_lock_class assign_lock_key dump_stack(); ratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10); raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock); // init rs->lock here and get the following dump_stack: ========================================================= INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504 [...] Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170 dump_stack+0x18/0x30 register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0 __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0 lock_acquire+0x120/0x450 _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0 ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220 __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4] ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4] __ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4] ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4] [...] ========================================================= Normally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so ___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing rs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value via the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is uninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by accessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all initializations are complete to avoid such problems. References: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-40998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23afcd52af06880c6c913a0ad99022b8937b575c https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/645267906944a9aeec9d5c56ee24a9096a288798 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4b4fda34e535756f9e774fb2d09c4537b7dfd1c https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-40998.mbox