Bug 124368 (DEFECT000304025)

Summary:	<Superior References> Need to handle the control tag in the ldapmodify utility
Product:	[Novell Products] NDS SDK	Reporter:	Jim Sermersheim <jimse>
Component:	LDAP C SDK	Assignee:	Jeff Vincent <jvincent>
Status:	VERIFIED FIXED	QA Contact:	Sundar Swamy <ssundar>
Severity:	Minor
Priority:	P5 - None	CC:	aclark
Version:	OCT 2006 NDK	Keywords:	English
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	Other
OS:	Other
Whiteboard:
Found By:	Other	Services Priority:
Business Priority:		Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---	IT Deployment:	---

Description Rajkumar V 2005-10-10 22:54:43 UTC



------- Bug moved to this database by vrajkumar@novell.com 2005-10-10 16:54 -------

This bug previously known as bug DEFECT000304025 at remedy/
remedy/show_bug.cgi?id=DEFECT000304025
Originally filed under the NDS SDK product and LDAP C SDK component.

---------
<remedy_version_found_in> BLANK </remedy_version_found_in>
---------
<remedy_milestone> BLANK </remedy_milestone>
---------
<remedy_details> The ldapmodify utility needs to handle the control
      tag defined in RFC 2849. This is needed for the superior references
      work being done for Nexor/Govt of Canada/Entrust </remedy_details>
---------
<remedy_notes> dsteck (  8/5/02 10:44:30 AM  Testing - Submitter/Final )
      Code review done.  We plan to push this change back to OpenLDAP shortly.

dsteck (  7/25/02 12:51:33 PM  Fixing - Fix Is Checked-In )
Updated ldapmodify.exe to support the "control:" tag in an LDIF file.
The fix will be in builds dated  July 25, 2002 or later.


jimse (  6/22/02 8:31:09 AM  Fixing - Failed ) Please create a child defect
for the -M switch, and leave this defect open. We should still implement
support for the control tag as it is described in the LDIF standard.

dsteck (  6/17/02 10:11:02 AM  Fixing - Fix Is Checked-In ) While we should
support the control tag called out in the RFC, we believe a better solution
is to add an option to ldapmodify, ldapsearch, ldapdelete, etc to add this
control for all operations.

From a user perspective it's probably easier to do this, than to have to
code up a control in LDIF.

We enabled  the -M option (or -MM to make it critical) on all the ldap
utilities.

 </remedy_notes>