|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Zapping does not block the screensaver | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 | Reporter: | Jens Siebert <jsiebert> |
| Component: | GNOME | Assignee: | Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | ||
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Customer | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: |
Patch for Zapping to add screensaver blocking for gnome-screensaver
Package with attached patch |
||
|
Description
Jens Siebert
2005-10-11 08:16:01 UTC
I believe that such apps typically call "xscreensaver-command -deactivate" at intervals, which is the software equivalent of jarring the mouse or pressing the shift key as far as xscreensaver is concerned. There's a "gnome-screensaver-command --deactivate" command that has the same effect. Presumably zapping needs to be patched to handle gnome-screensaver. What happens if you install the xscreensaver package, does it work then? It seems that the xscreensaver package is installed be default. --snip rpm -qa | grep xscreen xscreensaver-4.22-5 kdeartwork3-xscreensaver-3.4.2-6 --snap If gnome-screensaver is also installed, its preferred by GNOME now. Rodrigo, we can probably either tweak the xscreensaver bits (preferred) or doing something similar to the kscreensaver hacks in the package. Created attachment 56721 [details]
Patch for Zapping to add screensaver blocking for gnome-screensaver
Hi there,
i've looked at the code of zapping and hacked together the screensaver-blocking for gnome-screensaver myself. Have at a look at the attached patch for information.
Basically it queries the gnome-screensaver if it is running (but inactive) and calls gnome-screensaver-command --poke at some interval.
It might not be a great solution but it works for me. Maybe you're interested in it.
Rodrigo, there is an actual patch here, can you review it? Created attachment 81686 [details]
Package with attached patch
The patch looks good to me, just want some confirmation that it indeed works as expected before submitting to autobuild.
Works for me! ok, package submitted then |