|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | No network connectivity with Davicom/tulip nic | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 | Reporter: | Uwe Schmeling <u.schmeling> |
| Component: | Kernel | Assignee: | Karsten Keil <karsten.keil> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Minor | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | forgotten_xOiK_JGQNy |
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | SuSE Linux 10.0 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Uwe Schmeling
2005-10-18 07:39:00 UTC
What happens when you disable ACPI ("acpi=off" or at least "pci=noacpi")? Did you try a failsafe boot?
Forcing the usage of module dmfe instead of the installation automatical selected tulip module solves the problems. Controller is a Davicom laptop onboard device. Should be fixed! Ok, so I will close this one for now. *** Bug 121853 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Why is this bug closed when you must override Yast's default nic choice. The Tulip driver is defective and should be patched or other users will be forced to call installation support or search bugzilla. Why has this bug been closed when you must override Yast's default nic choice. If the Tulip driver is defective in 10.0 final, it should be patched or other users will be forced to call installation support or search bugzilla. Reporter said "should be fixed". Btw, I don't think the driver is broken per se, as it seems to work quite well on lots of cards. It seems it's just those cheap Davicom cards that make problems. And btw, why is this bug CRITICAL when there is an easy workaround? Anyway, I think we should just remove the PCI ID from the tulip driver so the dmfe driver is automatically used. Please provide the needed info for that. The hardware description in this bug report is next to non-existant. What is the needed hardware description? 2 comments: I have classified this bug as critical, as I didn't know about the dmfe workaround at this time. The hardware is like that (lspci): 00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Davicom Semiconductor, Inc. 21x4x DEC-Tulip compatible 10/100 Ethernet (rev 20) resp.: 00:08.0 Class 0200: 1282:9102 (rev 20) Hope we are completed now. we always have some duplicate drivers, sometimes one of it isn't working. |