|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Bootsplash suspend/resume cycle support | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Alexander Lavrinenko <lavrinenko_alex> |
| Component: | Kernel | Assignee: | Holger Macht <hmacht> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | aj, behlert, mls |
| Version: | Alpha 1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | Image of kernel panic | ||
|
Description
Alexander Lavrinenko
2005-10-20 05:33:33 UTC
Feel free to submit a patch :-). Against swsusp3, preferably. Yes, it is planned, no, do not expect it any time soon. Well, is it scheduled for SUSE 10.1 or later release? TIA Okay, now we are close enough to have infrastructure to actually do the splashing. It will not make it to SUSE 10.1, but next release might be possible. Rafael has code to do suspend from userland, and about half of it is already in -mm. When thats in mainline, we can do esc-to-abort, compression, encryption, etc. ...goes to Stefan, because he knows where to reassign it :-). BTW I've already implemented "enter-to-abort-suspend" in my working copy, and userland parts should be available at suspend.sf.net. Any help is welcome. regarding comment #2: it will not make it into 10.1, sorry for that, but the underlying technology is just too new yet. I played around with it a little bit and it seems to work. I had a problem where kacpid loaded my cpu to 99% after resuming. But this might be another problem and I have to look at this issue more closely... Pavel, the c files you are hosting on sourceforge will be the most recent implementations of the userspace stuff, right? So possible enhancements I have I can send to you? Or should this stay as simple as possible to be used as some kind of example or template and we should host our own implementations? Closing in favour of feature 100222. I think INVALID fits best because it is no real bug ;-) Means: It will be available in 10.2 - if nothing critical hapens :) |