|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | VUL-0: CVE-2005-3351: spamassassin DoS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Novell Products] SUSE Security Incidents | Reporter: | Ludwig Nussel <lnussel> |
| Component: | Incidents | Assignee: | Carsten Hoeger <choeger> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Security Team bot <security-team> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | security-team |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | CVE-2005-3351: CVSS v2 Base Score: 5.0 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) | ||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | spamassassin-3.0.4-4570-avoid-segfault-large-headers.patch | ||
|
Description
Ludwig Nussel
2005-11-11 08:58:14 UTC
Hmmm, SA 3.1 came out after 3.0.4, no 3.0.5 version at all. Just downloaded the spm of the newest fedora package and it looks like the patch named spamassassin-3.0.4-4570-avoid-segfault-large-headers.patch is the fix. Created attachment 57238 [details]
spamassassin-3.0.4-4570-avoid-segfault-large-headers.patch
affected versions: 10.0, 9.3 and 9.2 (if spamassassin 2.x is NOT affected). How to proceed? Should I submit packages? Hmm, the regex looks complicated :-) Michael can you judge whether this is a valid fix for the described problem? Looks ok to me. I'm a bit worried about the \Q \E, but this seems to be an additional bug fix. Thanks. Maintenance-Tracker-2898 Yes, please submit packages unless you say this a non-issue. updates released CVE-2005-3351: CVSS v2 Base Score: 5.0 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) |