|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Suggests/Enhances Support in the Yast 2 Package manager | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Marcus Rückert <mrueckert> |
| Component: | YaST2 | Assignee: | Michael Schröder <mls> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf> |
| Severity: | Enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | dmueller, jsrain, ma, mls, ro |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Marcus Rückert
2005-12-02 19:45:26 UTC
"it would be cool" sounds more like an enhancement. Some more unrelated comments: 1) Suggests == Requires, Enhances == ? Enhances is a weak version of the "Reverse Requires" we talked about when discussing the new patch engine. But I don't like the name "Reverse Requires", I suggest "Essential" or "EssentialFor". 2) IMHO three levels of requires would be optimal: "must", "strong", "weak". must == package must be installed strong == package should be installed if not conflicting, user is not asked weak == ask user if it should be installed or not Another comment: RPM-4.4 also defines a "Priority" field, it may be a means to specify the suggests/enhances priority. No documentation, though. micheal ... what is the status of the discussion? did the private discussions of gustavo with jeff help? Don't know, you have to ask Gustavo... STABLE has support for it |