|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Issues with OvisLink PCMCIA WLAN card | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 | Reporter: | Michael Stather <kontakt> |
| Component: | Network | Assignee: | Joachim Gleissner <joachim.gleissner> |
| Status: | VERIFIED INVALID | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | ||
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: |
persistant rules file
YaST2 logs |
||
|
Description
Michael Stather
2006-01-19 17:11:57 UTC
Created attachment 64060 [details]
persistant rules file
Created attachment 64065 [details]
YaST2 logs
There is no general rule how WLAN interface are named. If you do not like the default name, you can alter it by changing it in the rules file you attached. Your card is most probably a cardbus one. These show up as PCI device, not as PCMCIA ones, therefore the PCMCIA checkbox is unchecked. The card is a cardbus one, that´s right. But my other WLAN card is named wlan0, so if "there´s no general rule" I don´t understand why it´s named like that. What about adding a rule which forces all WLAN cards to be named as as wlanX, not just USB ones? The name in the rule depends on the driver. Therefore it might be eth or wlan or sometime ath. The name does not matter at all. Change it if you don't like it. |