|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Installer fail when installing OSS 10.1 via network/samba | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | denis forveille <denis_forveille> |
| Component: | Installation | Assignee: | Jiri Srain <jsrain> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf> |
| Severity: | Critical | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | ||
| Version: | Beta 1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86-64 | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: |
YaST log files
yast2 install logs OSS 10.1 beta network/samba |
||
|
Description
denis forveille
2006-01-21 15:11:00 UTC
Please attach the YaST log files. This did not happen during my several installations, so I need more details. Created attachment 64399 [details]
YaST log files
I tried again to install OSS 10.1 beta2 and I still have the problem. This time the installer fails on another rpm than before... It seems that this is related to installing OSS 10.1b2 via the network using Samba. It seems that the installer "loose" the connection with the samba server at some point, and this, always on the same rpm. So, my first analysis was wrong, and I changed the title of this bug to better reflect what the problem seems to be. I also downgraded the criticality I will upload the new Yast log files later BTW, I was successfull to install OSS v10.1b2 via NFS (Same Server, but this time I expanded the ISO files into soem shared directories) !!! Created attachment 65346 [details]
yast2 install logs OSS 10.1 beta network/samba
yast2 install logs OSS 10.1 beta network/samba
Can you reproduce the problem with Beta4? The package manager was replaced for Beta4... If you can, please, attach the logs... ???? The "Most Annoying Bugs" for beta 4 explicitly say: "...Network Installations: smb/cifs does not work, http, nfs and ftp do work..." An you want me to test an smb/cifs installation??? I wanted to skip beta4 and give a try to beta5 if no such statement appear anymore. Sorry, forgot it. In this case let's wait for Beta which has this problem fixed... Just tested Beta5 and it installs properly, thus resolving the bug as FIXED. Please, reopen and attach logs if you still have problems with Beta5. |