|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Radeon DRM driver patch | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch> |
| Component: | Kernel | Assignee: | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | eich, kernel01, suse-beta |
| Version: | Beta 2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: |
Current DRM patch by Benjamin
Patch against kernel-source of 10.1 Beta3 |
||
|
Description
Stefan Dirsch
2006-01-30 17:13:41 UTC
Created attachment 65719 [details]
Current DRM patch by Benjamin
Created attachment 66151 [details]
Patch against kernel-source of 10.1 Beta3
Are these patches accepted by upstream yet? I don't know. At least the patch is no yet in DRM CVS. Proably this needs to be discussed with Benjamin and Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>. AFAIK he synchronizes the DRM CVS and upstream kernel sources. Yes, he does. Please discuss it with him, and find out the acceptance of it. We don't want to carry around such a patch for the next 7 years unless we know it's accepted into mainline... done. I've included you in Cc ... Greg, as you can see there's nothing to do on your side for now. I'll keep you up-to-date. Bugreport remains therefore on status "NEEDINFO". Due to the immature state of this patch set, I really do not think we can accept it at this late stage, sorry. We are _way_ past the "add new features" deadline... The patch has not been committed yet to DRM CVS. I'll keep you up-to-date. Small update. Dave Airlie finally committed benh's memory management patch to DRM CVS (2006-02-18/2006-02-19). --> http://gate.crashing.org/~benh/radeon-memmap-drm-5.diff Greg, care for a little bit of DRM fun? :-) Sure, I'll take it, but it should still be NEEDINFO, as I don't want to add such a big change so late in the cycle... Of course. Only apply it when it has been committed upstream. Unfortunately I probably won't notice when it gets committed upstream. :-( Still not upstream (checked 2.6.16). Anyway, it's way to late for 10.1. Closing as WONTFIX. |