Bug 146838

Summary:	Installer places /boot on LV!! even when 0x83 non-LV partition selected.
Product:	[openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1	Reporter:	Clyde Kunkel <clydekunkel7734>
Component:	Installation	Assignee:	Thomas Fehr <fehr>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:	Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf>
Severity:	Critical
Priority:	P5 - None	CC:	john_hull, kernel01, kpenrose
Version:	Beta 2
Target Milestone:	Beta 4
Hardware:	x86
OS:	Other
Whiteboard:
Found By:	Other	Services Priority:
Business Priority:		Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---	IT Deployment:	---
Attachments:	YaST2 log files as requested Items requested in comment #2

Description Clyde Kunkel 2006-01-30 23:30:48 UTC

Install from downloaded CDs.  Using LVs over software raid5 PVs.  Boot paritions are not LV.  Custom partitioning used.  Selected /dev/hda6, edit, noformat, (already done external to install as ext3), mount point /boot.  Then selected /dev/VolGroup1/SuSE101b2, edit, mount point /.  Selected finish, and msg that SuSE101b2 was being formated.  Software installed from CD-1, then configuration prior to first boot (bz 146747 applied here).  On firstboot, no files on /dev/hda6.  Booted SuSE10.0 on same system, mounted /SuSE101b2 on a tmp dir and found a dir /boot with all of the boot and grub files!!!  As all know, can't boot from an LV!  On the same system, installed SuSE 10.0 without any problems.

Comment 1 Michael Gross 2006-01-31 10:25:07 UTC

Please attach the yast logfiles located in /var/log/YaST2.

Comment 2 Michael Gross 2006-01-31 10:25:43 UTC

Additional, please attach the output of `fdisk -l', `hwinfo --disk' and the generated /etc/fstab. Thanks.

Comment 3 Clyde Kunkel 2006-01-31 15:11:41 UTC

Created attachment 65866 [details]
YaST2 log files as requested

Comment 4 Clyde Kunkel 2006-01-31 15:13:03 UTC

Created attachment 65867 [details]
Items requested in comment #2

Comment 5 Thomas Fehr 2006-01-31 16:06:48 UTC

I see, order of mount commands is wrong. Looking into that.

Comment 6 Thomas Fehr 2006-01-31 16:57:39 UTC

Bug will be fixed in beta#4.

Comment 7 Thomas Fehr 2006-02-01 10:41:46 UTC

*** Bug 146859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Thomas Fehr 2006-02-02 10:37:44 UTC

*** Bug 147494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Thomas Fehr 2006-02-08 09:50:37 UTC

*** Bug 147366 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***