|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Installing apparmor user packages should install auditd | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Tony Jones <tonyj> |
| Component: | Selections | Assignee: | Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | ||
| Version: | Beta 3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Development | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Tony Jones
2006-02-02 23:57:00 UTC
If you don't deselct it yourself, it will be installed. So what did you do? Minimal install, text-only (no gnome nor X). This does not install AppArmor user packages nor audit. Installing AppArmor from Yast does not install audit. Oops, meant to file this against SL10.1 beta3, not SLES10 beta3. Apologies. Stefan, does SL have an AppArmor selection? if yes, please add audit. If not, this is something we have solve later, we agreed on not adding a hard requies, since not everybody wishes to have audit running. There's no AppArmor selection for SL, but all the important AppArmor packages are in our default selection. Among these is audit as well. Ah, okay, I'll drop our local patch to add the requires:. I wasn't aware that an explicit decision was made to not have a dependency on audit. Thanks. Issue still remains that nothing was installed when asking for a non graphical system. Tony: that's covered under this bug https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=147878 no? Correct. #147878 can be used to track it. Hopefully noone will be stupid enough to deselect audit from the detailed packages installed by the default list, as far as I understand, Yast won't detect that this is an issue for the AppArmor packages. |