|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Changes in Network Card module do not become immediately effective | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Forgotten User 55iwwMllzz <forgotten_55iwwMllzz> |
| Component: | YaST2 | Assignee: | Martin Vidner <mvidner> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf> |
| Severity: | Major | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | mvidner, suse-beta |
| Version: | Beta 3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Beta-Customer | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Forgotten User 55iwwMllzz
2006-02-05 01:05:12 UTC
please attach the logs: http://en.opensuse.org/Bug_Reporting_FAQ#YaST Got the logs myself. Christian, this is related to the changes in https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135595#c39 I basically do if rcnetfork status; then rcnetwork reload else rcnetwork start fi It fails like this. I think that it is nonsense to fail "start" and require a "reatart" or "reload" instead. rcnetwork status: Checking for the NetworkManager: Checking for the NetworkManagerDispatcher: Advanced Network Control System is active as well. Check your config or restart network. eth0 device: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43 (rev 41) eth0 configuration: eth-id-00:00:1c:b5:70:7e eth0 ifplugd is running eth0 cable is connected eth0 DHCP client (dhcpcd) is running eth0 IP address: 10.20.1.6/21 modem0 lo IP address: 127.0.0.1/8 ..dead rcnetwork start: 'NetControl' is active but configuration says 'NetworkManager'. Call network restart instead...failed No, imho this is no nonsense. rcnetwork has to start two different services mutually exclusive. And 'start' will start one of them except network is running already. I would never expect that rcnetwork start would shut down any interfaces. Why don't you call rcnetwork restart in the else case? I wrote > I think that it is nonsense to fail "start" and require a > "restart" or "reload" instead. I think that it is still true in general(*) but I agree that it would be bad if start shut down an interface without warning. So I will use restart instead of start. (*) "Init scripts shall ensure that they will behave sensibly if invoked with start when the service is already running, or with stop when not running" http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html Fixed in yast2-2.13.27. |