|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | yast lvm_config does not see all volumes (particular volume name) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | First Name Last Name <sinderbox+novell> |
| Component: | YaST2 | Assignee: | Thomas Fehr <fehr> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | ||
| Version: | Beta 4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | RC 1 | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | y2log | ||
|
Description
First Name Last Name
2006-02-08 00:55:18 UTC
Created attachment 66911 [details]
y2log
Using dashes in LV names is prone to lead into problems. If possible simply dont use dashes in LV names. W At creation time I saw the dash doubling. Was not sure if it was caused by LVM or YaST After that, I did not encounter any LVM problem. But when decided to delete it just in case, realized it is invisible within YaST. (I strongly believe however former YaST versions DID see the LV) Of course I can do it from the command line. I will leave it there until I am not further info/testing required. The dash doubling happens internally by LVM since the naming scheme of LVM LVs in device-mapper uses the single dash for certain special cases (e.g. as delimiter between vg name and lv name). Probably the invisibility in YaST2 is caused by the mismatch between dm name (s10-root--10.1) and lv name (root-10.1). Yes, check the three Y2log lines I posted above. YaST runs dmsetup table "s10-root-10.1" and fails. it should run dmsetup table "s10-root--10.1" 0 2097152 linear 3:4 471966080 which works Shouldn't it? Now I am getting confuse the LV is called s10-root-10.1 but its mapping in the filesystem is /dev/mapper/s10-root--10.1 Its a YaST or dmsetup bug? Of course it is a YaST bug. dmsetup does not in any way care about the names of its tables. *** Bug 153573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** problem should be fixed in RC1 |