|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | multisync x86-64 does not include bluetooth support | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 10.2 | Reporter: | ferdinand gassauer <gassauer> |
| Component: | Mobile Devices | Assignee: | Stefan Behlert <behlert> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 - Medium | CC: | sbrabec |
| Version: | Alpha 3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | Alpha 4 plus | ||
| Hardware: | x86-64 | ||
| OS: | SuSE Linux 10.1 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
ferdinand gassauer
2006-02-11 22:09:48 UTC
The multisync-irmc-bluetooth-0.82+cvs-8.x86_64.rpm should be on the media of SL10.0. I currently have no media available, but a grep over an iso here showed it at least in the CD1-directory of the DVD. yes it is on the media and was installed, but somehow not available in multisync. so I tried to i586 version which worked. Ok, thanks for the clarification. Hm, meanwhile I looked at the packages but saw no reason why it should not work. Unfortunately all 64bit machines are currently used for 10.1, so this bug wil still rest a while :( so now I am on 10.1 and have these packages installed multisync-ldap-0.82+cvs-25 multisync-syncml-0.82+cvs-25 multisync-opie-0.82+cvs-25 multisync-cli-0.90.17+svn-2 multisync-gui-0.90.17+svn-2 multisync-evolution-0.82+cvs-25 multisync-0.82+cvs-25 multisync-backup-0.82+cvs-25 multisync-irmc-bluetooth-0.82+cvs-25 multisync-kdepim-0.82+cvs-25 multisync-irmc-0.82+cvs-25 BTW gnome-bluetooth-manager finds my device (phone) I have removed my ~/.multisync directory still no bluetooth connection typ to select - its still grey. IR and Cable are available. (BTW works fine on i686) same problem with the build of Aug 31st http://software.opensuse.org/download/repositories/OpenSync/SL-10.1/x86_64/ IRMC bluetooth is still "grey" (not available) for normal user as well as for root where can I look further? reproduced it today. fixed, won't make it into alpha4 but should be in alpha5 *** Bug 210019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |