|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | don't assign /data mountpoints by default? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Ludwig Nussel <lnussel> |
| Component: | YaST2 | Assignee: | Andreas Jaeger <aj> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | aj, coolo, gp, kukuk, suse-beta |
| Version: | Beta 4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | RC 1 | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Ludwig Nussel
2006-02-20 10:42:57 UTC
I'm redirecting this to Thomas. Project management has to decide about removal of the /data and /windows mount points. just for reference: I'm all for it How much work is this? Thorsten, what's your idea on it? I never liked the /data mountpoints. I found the /windows mountpoints quite usefull, espeically with wine or so. Removing the either /windows or /data mount points (or both) is not much work. yeah, /windows(/C) might be useful also for beagle which looks there for your "old data" Ok, there's consensus to remove /data. I guess we should keep /windows for now. Ok with everybody? Should be fixed in RC1 |