Bug 154969

Summary: OpenOffice has wrong locale(...) provides
Product: [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 Reporter: Andreas Jaeger <aj>
Component: OpenOffice.orgAssignee: Petr Mladek <pmladek>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf>
Severity: Critical    
Priority: P5 - None    
Version: Beta 6   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: Other   
OS: Other   
Whiteboard:
Found By: Other Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---

Description Andreas Jaeger 2006-03-03 12:58:26 UTC
Just found the following in /var/log/zmd-backend.log:

2006-03-03 13:57:36 <2> x40(19047) [DEFINE_LOGGROUP] ResolvableImpl.cc(operator()):82 Looks wrong
 locale(OpenOffice_org:OpenOffice_org:af)
2006-03-03 13:57:36 <2> x40(19047) [zypp] LanguageCode.cc(lookup):100 Malformed LanguageCode 'Ope
nOffice' (expect 2 or 3-letter)
2006-03-03 13:57:36 <2> x40(19047) [zypp] LanguageCode.cc(lookup):105 Malformed LanguageCode 'Ope
nOffice' (not lower case)
2006-03-03 13:57:36 <1> x40(19047) [zypp] LanguageCode.cc(lookup):113 Remember LanguageCode 'Open
Office': ''
2006-03-03 13:57:36 <2> x40(19047) [zypp] CountryCode.cc(lookup):90 Malformed CountryCode 'org:af
' (expect 2-letter)
2006-03-03 13:57:36 <2> x40(19047) [zypp] CountryCode.cc(lookup):95 Malformed CountryCode 'org:af
' (not upper case)
2006-03-03 13:57:36 <1> x40(19047) [zypp] CountryCode.cc(lookup):103 Remember CountryCode 'org:af
': ''
Comment 1 Klaus Kämpf 2006-03-03 13:32:13 UTC
The 'locale(...)' provides is wrong. It specifies the 'parent' package (the string before the colon) two times.
It should be "locale(OpenOffice_org:af)"


Now great, "maintainer OpenOffice_org" says pmladek@suse.cz but bugzilla refuses pmladek@suse.cz and pmladek@suse.de.

Aj, help please ...
Comment 2 Petr Mladek 2006-03-03 14:01:31 UTC
No, it is correct in OpenOffice_org-af. It must be the problem with myspell-african, bug #154077

Reopen this bug if I am wrong, please.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154077 ***
Comment 3 Klaus Kämpf 2006-03-03 14:12:16 UTC
Argh, yes, you're right. Sorry !