|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | RPM: support for Enhances, Suggests, Supplements, Recommends incomplete | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen> |
| Component: | Basesystem | Assignee: | Michael Schröder <mls> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Critical | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | hare, ro, suse-beta |
| Version: | Beta 6 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | agruen:track | ||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | The first attempt to add a %__find_supplements script as in the attached patch didn't work. | ||
|
Description
Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-03-04 19:26:10 UTC
Created attachment 71259 [details]
The first attempt to add a %__find_supplements script as in the attached patch didn't work.
I would prefer to use Provides tags for now until support for the new tags is reasonably complete, even though Supplements tags are supposed to be more "correct": Provides works today...
Adding support for our complete set of dependencies is also something for 'rug' ... Provides are just wrong, please fix supplements! Could you at least explain to us what you meant with "didn't work"? The patch from comment 1 didn't have any effect on the resulting RPM; the find-supplements script was not invoked. In addition to that, even if it was, I wouldn't have had a way to find out which supplements ended up in the package due to the lack of querying support. Until rpm supports querying for supplements and enhances tags, ~mls/rpmdumpreq can be used as a substitute. Fixed in STABLE. |