Bug 156382

Summary:	B7 upgrade: "1.7 TB to update" and Back/Forward confusion
Product:	[openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1	Reporter:	Stephan Binner <stbinner>
Component:	Installation	Assignee:	Jiri Srain <jsrain>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf>
Severity:	Critical
Priority:	P5 - None	CC:	coolo, eich, mc, meissner, suse-beta, tiwai, wstephenson
Version:	Beta 7
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	Other
OS:	Other
Whiteboard:
Found By:	Development	Services Priority:
Business Priority:		Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---	IT Deployment:	---
Attachments:	my log file

Description Stephan Binner 2006-03-09 10:12:27 UTC

Trying to upgrade from SUSE Linux 10.0/i386 (back translated from German):

"Couldn't resolve all conflicts. You have to manually resolve them:

 Packages to update: 626
 Packages to install: 17
 Packages to delete: 0
 Overall size of packages to update: 1.7 TB"

Clicking on "Packages":

 "Cannot install lukemftp because it is conflicting with lftp

  A conflict over lukemftp == 1.5-586 (lukemftp) requires the removal of to be installed lukemftp-1.5-586.i586

 ( ) do not install lukemftp
 ( ) do not install lftp
 ( ) ignore this conflict of lukemftp"

After resolving the conflict the summary then shows:

 Packages to update: 0
 Packages to install: 715
 Packages to delete: 0
 Overall size of packages to update: 1.9 TB"

After clicking on "Back" and selecting same installation to upgrade again it changes to

 Packages to update: 2
 Packages to install: 25
 Packages to delete: 0
 Overall size of packages to update: 174 GB"

After clicking on "Back" and selecting same installation to upgrade again it changes to

 Packages to update: 2
 Packages to install: 22
 Packages to delete: 0
 Overall size of packages to update: 178.5 GB"

After clicking on "Back" and... no, I stop now here. :-)

Comment 1 Michael Gross 2006-03-09 13:26:47 UTC

Please attach the y2logs.

Comment 2 Will Stephenson 2006-03-09 13:58:49 UTC

I also got "1.8TB to update" in the upgrade summary page.  But I didn't mess around with Back and Forward after that.  When the actual installation screen came up it showed a total of 1.8GB so I assume the summary page just gets the units wrong - off by an order of magnitude?  

I'll attach the y2logs when the install has finished.

Comment 3 Stephan Binner 2006-03-09 14:04:25 UTC

Renaming as there is a separate bug report (#156450) only for lukemftp.

Comment 4 Michael Gross 2006-03-09 14:28:27 UTC

*** Bug 156466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Michael Calmer 2006-03-09 15:41:13 UTC

I got 3.1 TB but when it starts to install it says 3.1 GB which migth be correct.
Is there somewhere a factor 1000 ? 

Please say if you want my y2log* too.

Comment 6 Greg Kroah-Hartman 2006-03-10 00:26:28 UTC

Same issue here, 2.2TB, should be 2.2GB.

Comment 7 Stephan Kulow 2006-03-10 09:21:05 UTC

Created attachment 72174 [details]
my log file

Comment 8 Stephan Kulow 2006-03-10 09:22:43 UTC

The "KDE Devel" selection wasn't marked for me on update btw.

Comment 10 Christian Boltz 2006-03-11 00:19:07 UTC

*** Bug 157319 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Stephan Binner 2006-03-11 20:28:59 UTC

*** Bug 157224 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Lukas Ocilka 2006-03-13 12:28:15 UTC

*** Bug 157321 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Martin Vidner 2006-03-15 16:36:58 UTC

Terabyte issue fixed in yast2-packager-2.13.41, Beta 8.

The random package count comes from Update.ycp -> Jirka (we probably need to split the bug)

Comment 14 Jiri Srain 2006-03-15 19:26:21 UTC

The package count is bug 154720.

Martin, is there anything else to be fixed? It seems to me that there is nothing left, or?

Comment 15 Martin Vidner 2006-03-16 08:14:04 UTC

Nothing left.

Comment 16 Stephan Binner 2006-03-16 12:47:50 UTC

Trying a 10.0 update with 10.1 Beta 8 today says 

"Packages to update: 0
 Packages to install: 1193
 Packages to delete: 0
 Overall size of packages to update: 4.1GB"

which still look to be wrong numbers to me.

Comment 17 Jiri Srain 2006-03-16 15:44:15 UTC

Yes, this is bug 154720. Nothing else left...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154720 ***