Bug 158231

Summary:	Supplements don't seem to get resolved correctly
Product:	[openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1	Reporter:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen>
Component:	YaST2	Assignee:	Stefan Schubert <schubi>
Status:	RESOLVED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:	Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf>
Severity:	Normal
Priority:	P5 - None	CC:	suse-beta
Version:	Beta 7
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	Other
OS:	Other
Whiteboard:
Found By:	Other	Services Priority:
Business Priority:		Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---	IT Deployment:	---
Attachments:	Installed packages y2log yum meta-data Fixed yum meta-data

Description Andreas Gruenbacher 2006-03-15 13:55:13 UTC

See attachments

Comment 1 Andreas Gruenbacher 2006-03-15 13:57:15 UTC

Created attachment 73016 [details]
Installed packages

Comment 2 Andreas Gruenbacher 2006-03-15 13:59:11 UTC

Created attachment 73017 [details]
y2log

Comment 3 Andreas Gruenbacher 2006-03-15 14:00:07 UTC

Created attachment 73018 [details]
yum meta-data

Comment 4 Andreas Gruenbacher 2006-03-15 14:47:51 UTC

Created attachment 73031 [details]
Fixed yum meta-data

The previous meta-data were corrupted because of a broken version of createrepo. The supplements dependency is handled correctly with these fixed meta-data.

It should also be respected with the broken meta-data when ignoring all failed dependencies though, and that did not happen. So could you please check this case.

Comment 5 Stefan Schubert 2006-03-27 09:35:52 UTC

I cannot do anything with the yum meta-data format. The rpm-packages would be better to produce a testcase.
Meanwhile we have created testcases for supplments which shows the correct behaviour. So I assume that this bug is obsolete.
Feel free to reopen the bug and attach the link to the concerning rpm packages and which packages you have selected for installation.

Comment 6 Andreas Gruenbacher 2006-03-27 12:30:52 UTC

Sorry, I was initially asked to produce yum metadata. We have changed the mechanism how this all works meanwhile, so this bug is indeed obsolete.