|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | bash_completion missing in SL? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE Linux 10.1 | Reporter: | Martin Mrazik <mmrazik> |
| Component: | Selections | Assignee: | Ruediger Oertel <ro> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | aj, ro |
| Version: | Beta 8 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 144304 | ||
|
Description
Martin Mrazik
2006-03-28 11:38:06 UTC
Probably because of lack of space? sles10 most definitely not, I don't think we want to actively maintain this for all of SLES10 (platforms/lifetime) for SL ... AJ ? Let's leave it out, we cannot add everything and this is not used that much AFAIK. This is your decision. But what I think is that almost every bash user is using bash-completion. Just because once you start using it you can't stop. Other reason why to have this is that this package is really tiny (64k). Actually I don't even understand why is this not included in bash.rpm (at least in Debian it is so). But as I said - your decision.... The package is in no selection, so users will not notice it. If it's that important it should be installed by default. I'm not adding it for 10.1. |