|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | shutdown vs. lid close -- incorrect priorities | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 | Reporter: | macias - <bluedzins> |
| Component: | Basesystem | Assignee: | Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x <forgotten_ZhJd0F0L3x> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | aj |
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
macias -
2006-09-02 19:09:18 UTC
I'm confused by your report. You say "shutdown" and get suspend? ARe you sure you hit the right button? Is this reproduceable? (In reply to comment #1) > I'm confused by your report. In what way? My English? > You say "shutdown" and get suspend? No. I say "shutdown" AND _close the lid_ before it is shutted down ==> I get suspend. Wrong priority -- suspending should check if shutting down is not in progress. >ARe you sure you hit the right button? Yeah, I have only one ;-D > Is this reproduceable? Every time I want to get the described effect. You interrupted the shutdown process with the suspend request. Ok, now understood. this is fixed in 10.1. If we want an update for 10.0 for this issue, it might be possible. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 118823 *** |