Bug 229317

Summary: When suspending to ram with non-oss ATI's drivers, resuming will fail
Product: [openSUSE] openSUSE 10.2 Reporter: Tanel Kokk <tanel.kokk>
Component: X11 3rd PartyAssignee: Jammy Zhou <atilinuxnovellbugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch>
Severity: Normal    
Priority: P5 - None CC: behlert, tanel.kokk
Version: Final   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Other   
Whiteboard:
Found By: Other Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---

Description Tanel Kokk 2006-12-18 13:16:32 UTC
With non-oss ATI's drivers resuming from ram will fail.

When I'll suspend2ram manually and then I'll try to resume somehow (close and open laptop's lid, pushing several puttons, etc.), it won't work. System will stay suspended, until I'll do power-reset.

My system: IBM Thinkpad T43, OpenSuSE 10.2, non-oss ATI drivers (fglrx_7_1_0_SUSE102-8.32.5-1)
Graphic card: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc M22 [Radeon Mobility M300]
 
s2ram -n
Machine matched entry 82:
    sys_vendor   = 'IBM'
    sys_product  = ''
    sys_version  = 'ThinkPad T43'
    bios_version = ''
Fixes: 0x3  S3_BIOS S3_MODE
This machine can be identified by:
    sys_vendor   = "IBM"
    sys_product  = "266845G"
    sys_version  = "ThinkPad T43"
    bios_version = "1YET59WW (1.24 )"
Comment 1 Siegfried Olschner 2006-12-20 09:27:46 UTC
Mobile devices?
Comment 2 Stefan Behlert 2006-12-20 11:03:01 UTC
More like X11 3rd Party.
What surprises me is that nothing is happening. I could understand that resuming fails, but if I get the bugreport right it's not even starting.
I suggest to check the BIOS-settings, and then to test without the flgrx driver.


Comment 3 Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2006-12-20 12:05:17 UTC
Sorry, illegal drivers are not supported :-)
Comment 4 Matej Horvath 2006-12-20 12:51:13 UTC
This has been already reported in the 10.1 and SLED 10.

Bug 224793
Bug 182151
Comment 5 Tanel Kokk 2006-12-20 22:25:40 UTC
To Stefan Seyfried #3: illegal drivers? You are calling Ati's non-oss drivers as illegal ones!? interesting...

To Matej: do you happen to know, is there any hopes, that suspending/resuming problems for ati's non-oss will be fixed in near future?
Comment 6 Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2006-12-21 08:54:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> To Stefan Seyfried #3: illegal drivers? You are calling Ati's non-oss drivers
> as illegal ones!? interesting...

Ask the kernel developers if they think it violates their copyrights.
Hint: they think it does.
I don't really care, but i have more to gain from friendly kernel developers fixing my bugs than from proprietary drivers ;-)
Comment 7 Stefan Dirsch 2007-01-15 22:52:07 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 182151 ***