Bug 448499

This test is due 11/26. I push up the priority to P1. 

Created attachment 255046 [details]
patch uploaded.

MORE COMMENTS:

also "list item" role in CheckedListBox and ListBox have incorrect states.

SWF "list item":
ENABLED, FOCUSABLE, SELECTABLE, SENSITIVE, SHOWING, SINGLE_LINE, TRANSIENT, VISIBLE

GTK “list item":
ENABLED, FOCUSABLE, SELECTABLE, SENSITIVE, SHOWING, VISIBLE, +-SELECTED, +-FOCUSED

Created attachment 255112 [details]
patch uploaded.

The controls are actually behaving as currently described in the spec, except that the spec doesn't list SingleLine and doesn't list states for the children of a ListBox (it does list states for children of a CheckedListBox).  So mostly the question is whether the spec should be changed.  I agree that what is currently there is not quite like a Gtk.List or a Gtk.TreeTable.

Hi Mike, let me make sure again that these two controls are implemented depend on the spec, it means they role name are similar to Gtk.List, they states are similar to Gtk.Store + Gtk.TreeView, right? Thanks Mike!

have talk with Mike, I would like to drop down the priority and severity


<mgorse|away> calen: That's what the spec currently lists
<calen> mgorse|away, brad : yes, except "single line" not in spec. another opinion, I mean we need add it into spec, and also I think we need modify spec because CheckedListBox and ListBox not similar to Gtk.List entirety except role name.
<calen> mgorse|away, of course, it's not a big issue, I just need make sure what is our test should following :)

I reruned this test in trunk r121663, checkedlistbox still have focus problem:

save below script as script.py, then running "script.py */samples/checkedlistbox.py", from the print you can see both list[0] and checkbox[0] have "focused" state. and the weird thing is in accerciser I didn't see checkbox[0] with focused state but I got it from pyatspi. how do you design *focused state? I didn't got the information from Specification.

list[0] states:[STATE_ENABLED, STATE_FOCUSABLE, STATE_FOCUSED, STATE_SENSITIVE, STATE_SHOWING, STATE_VISIBLE, STATE_MANAGES_DESCENDANTS]
checkboxs[0] states:[STATE_ENABLED, STATE_FOCUSABLE, STATE_FOCUSED, STATE_SELECTABLE, STATE_SENSITIVE, STATE_SHOWING, STATE_SINGLE_LINE, STATE_TRANSIENT, STATE_VISIBLE]

#!/usr/bin/env python

import pyatspi
import time
import subprocess as s
import sys

s.Popen(sys.argv[1])
print "sleeping"
time.sleep(5)
print "done sleeping"

reg = pyatspi.Registry
desktop = reg.getDesktop(0)
ipy = pyatspi.findDescendant(desktop, lambda x: x.name == 'ipy' and x.getRoleName() == 'application')
lists = pyatspi.findAllDescendants(ipy, lambda x: x.getRoleName() == 'list')
checkboxs = pyatspi.findAllDescendants(ipy, lambda x: x.getRoleName() == 'check box')

print "list[0] states:%s\r\ncheckboxs[0] states:%s"  % (lists[0].getState().getStates(), checkboxs[0].getState().getStates())


push to P2, thanks

Seems that fixing Bug #474863 will also fix this one.

This should be already working when Mike fixed #448499.

(In reply to comment #10)
> This should be already working when Mike fixed #448499.
I meant: Bug #474863.

list role doesn't seem to be used any more. closing.

thanks for Stephen's help to close this bug

I add a new bug480218 for duplicate 'focused' issue(Comment #8)