|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | VUL-0: CVE-2004-0400: buffer overflows in exim | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Novell Products] SUSE Security Incidents | Reporter: | Sebastian Krahmer <krahmer> |
| Component: | Incidents | Assignee: | Sebastian Krahmer <krahmer> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Security Team bot <security-team> |
| Severity: | Major | ||
| Priority: | P3 - Medium | CC: | patch-request, security-team |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | CVE-2004-0400: CVSS v2 Base Score: 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) | ||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: |
patch for 4.30 according fix from author
exim patchinfo box |
||
|
Description
Sebastian Krahmer
2004-05-07 16:37:14 UTC
<!-- SBZ_reproduce --> ... Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 15:15:33 +0200 From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org> To: vendor-sec@lst.de Subject: [vendor-sec] Re: 2 stack based overflows in at least exim 3.35 Martin Schulze wrote: > FYI: http://www.guninski.com/exim1.html > > I guess that it's public already. > > At least the second bug seems to be present in exim 4 as well. > The first bug may already be fixed in exim 4. Hmm, I just noticed that I forgot to add the CANs: CAN-2004-0399: exim buffer overflows with sender address/host name when sender_verify is enabled CAN-2004-0400: exim buffer overflow with header name when headers_check_syntax is enabled Regards, Joey We did never ship exim 3.x, so only the bug CAN-2004-0400 affects us (and only if verify=header_syntax was configured in an ACL, which is not the case in our default configuration). Created attachment 19197 [details]
patch for 4.30 according fix from author
Ok. Thanks. Which boxes and which maintained products are affected? I may create patchinfo files then. Affected are the box 8.1-9.1. This is a more detailed explanation of the bug by the author, which may be helpful: """ The bug was provoked by verify=header_syntax in combination with a header that contained an unqualified local part, and a large amount of white space between the name and the colon. """" (where verify=header_syntax was not configured by default.) Created attachment 19198 [details]
exim patchinfo box
8.1 is missing. edit_patchinfo didnt make that entry.
Feel free to change under /work/src/done/PATCHINFO (i already submitted
and made mode 0666).
edit_patchinfo is sligthly wrong, exim was not on the 8.1 box but on the ftp version: http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/ftp.suse.com/suse/i386/8.1/suse/i586/exim-4.10-37.i586.rpm Fixed packages for 8.1-9.1 are submitted now. Sebastian, I wanted to add 8.1-i386 to the /work/src/done/PATCHINFO/exim.patch, but the file is mode 0644. Can you do it, please? (Re-assigning the bug to you for further processing) added patch-request@suse.de to Cc. I wanted to do so, but the patchfile was aölready away, so I assume it has been fixed without me :-) Approved the packages without QA, since it was box only. CVE-2004-0400: CVSS v2 Base Score: 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) |