|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | no name resolution with browser when named is running | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.2 | Reporter: | Stefan Peter <stefan> |
| Component: | YaST2 | Assignee: | Marius Tomaschewski <mt> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Jiri Srain <jsrain> |
| Severity: | Major | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | r.ems, thomas.aho, ug |
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | 64bit | ||
| OS: | openSUSE 11.2 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Stefan Peter
2009-12-26 20:55:23 UTC
sorry I mean all patches installed available on 26.12.2009 (today) I think that's a netconfig problem.
yast2-network and yast2-dns both use the variable NETCONFIG_DNS_STATIC_SERVERS in /etc/sysconfig/network/config
yast2-network writes the nameservers to query into it (those should end in the resolv.conf)
yast2-dns the forwarders (those should end in the "forwarders {....}" directive in the bind config).
I'm not sure which of those two is right or if that even is a bug in netconfig, because after switching between those modules while testing, I got a resolv.conf with no "nameserver" entry anymore at all. Just a "search" entry but the NETCONFIG_DNS_STATIC_SERVERS variable was still configured.
An empty resolv.conf has worked on 11.1 so that's maybe the reason why nobody noticed the bug then. On 11.2 the fallback in the glibc for an empty resolv.conf is no longer "nameserver 127.0.0.1" like on 11.2 and that might trigger the bug.
Stefan, you might want to check your /etc/resolv.conf file. Is there an entry "nameserver 127.0.0.1" in it?
Marius, I assign this to you because the empty resolv.conf looks like a netconfig bug to me.
There might be a bug in yast2-network or yast2-dns too because I have doubts both have to use NETCONFIG_DNS_STATIC_SERVERS
*** Bug 567877 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #2) > Marius, I assign this to you because the empty resolv.conf looks like a > netconfig bug to me. No, netconfig makes use of a glibc feature to ask a local running nameserver then, see also https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558333#c7. Using the _working_ glibc feature is better than explicit 127.0.0.1 and/or ::1, because the timeouts are shorter and there is no problem with ipv4 only and ipv6 only systems. > There might be a bug in yast2-network or yast2-dns too because I have doubts > both have to use NETCONFIG_DNS_STATIC_SERVERS The intention of NETCONFIG_DNS_FORWARDER=bind mode is to allow update/extend the forwarders.conf with dynamically provided settings (dhcp, ppp, ...). Handled in https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561168 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 473308 *** |