Bug 97959

Summary: Some check marks are still shown as boxes
Product: [openSUSE] SUSE LINUX 10.0 Reporter: Mike Fabian <mfabian>
Component: YaST2Assignee: Adrian Schröter <adrian.schroeter>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Klaus Kämpf <kkaempf>
Severity: Normal    
Priority: P5 - None CC: coolo, johnk, mvidner
Version: Preview 2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: Other   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Found By: Development Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---
Attachments: installation-steps-dialog-000.png

Description Mike Fabian 2005-07-22 16:29:33 UTC
See attached screen shot.
Comment 1 Mike Fabian 2005-07-22 16:30:39 UTC
Created attachment 43052 [details]
installation-steps-dialog-000.png
Comment 2 Ladislav Slezák 2005-07-25 07:05:34 UTC
Stefan, this is strange - the check marks on the left side are displayed properly.

Martin, is a standard checkmark used there?
Comment 3 Stefan Hundhammer 2005-08-16 10:35:18 UTC
No, it's not strange at all - the check marks on the side bar are PNG icons, 
those in the dialog content should come from some Unicode-capable font. 
 
I am really fed up with those neverending broken glyphs. I think we will drop 
them in the near future. They create a lot more trouble than they are worth. 
 
Adrian, you wanted to take care of the font stuff... ;-) 
Comment 4 Mike Fabian 2005-08-16 10:41:29 UTC
Our current default font in instsys, "Albany AMT" (from the agfa-fonts package)
doesn't have the checkmarks.

Actually none of the other scalable fonts in instsys seems to
have the checkmarks either.

The only font in instsys which *does* have the checkmarks is
the "Gnu Unifont".

Therefore Qt3 should fallback to the "Gnu Unifont" for the checkmarks.

That Qt3 doesn't do this is a Qt3 bug.


Comment 5 Mike Fabian 2005-08-30 12:51:37 UTC
*** Bug 113746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Mike Fabian 2005-08-30 16:05:20 UTC
Add Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> to CC: as an additional Qt3 expert.
Comment 7 Mike Fabian 2005-10-04 12:56:53 UTC
*** Bug 61280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Adrian Schröter 2005-10-17 09:18:43 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 74601 ***