Bug 105781 - wheel highlight in sax2 mouse test inconsistent
Summary: wheel highlight in sax2 mouse test inconsistent
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SUSE LINUX 10.0
Classification: openSUSE
Component: SaX2 (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 2
Hardware: i686 SUSE Other
: P5 - None : Minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Marcus Schaefer
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-19 09:29 UTC by Uwe Girlich
Modified: 2005-08-19 13:59 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Beta-Customer
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Uwe Girlich 2005-08-19 09:29:26 UTC 
I have a wheel mouse and sax2 knows this. I perform the following steps in the
sax2 mouse test area:
* scroll down
  I get a round black arrow pointing down.
  scroll up
  I get a round black arrow pointing up.
This is the expected behaviour.

* scroll up
  I get a round black arrow pointing up.
  scroll down
  I get a round black arrow pointing up and down.
If I wait long enough to let the first up arrow disappear, I get
a single down arrow but if I scroll up and immediately down, I get a
combined arrow as long as I keep scrolling down. The up arrow does not
disappear any more.
Comment 1 Marcus Schaefer 2005-08-19 10:58:26 UTC 
:-) nice bug report but this behavior is intended. The problem is 
if I display the arrow up/down pictures a shorter time the action of 
scrolling the wheel will result in permanently show/disappear/show/disappear 
effect which would be really a bad implementation. 
 
Therefore the picture is displayed a view seconds. If you scroll to the 
other direction within this time both pictured are superposed which is 
intended and seems logical to me. 
 
So I'm sorry but I will not change that ;)
Comment 2 Uwe Girlich 2005-08-19 11:10:40 UTC 
> If you scroll to the other direction within this time both pictured are
> superposed
No. down-up-up-up shows first "down", then only "up"
but up-down-down-down shows first "up", then "up+down".

> which is intended and seems logical to me.
OK. If you say up-down behaves correctly, please correct the behaviour of down-up.
My bug reports is only about the inconsistency between up-down and down-up.
Comment 3 Marcus Schaefer 2005-08-19 13:59:13 UTC 
ok yes you are right, I fixed it ;)