Bug 113246 - installation overview provides wrong information
Summary: installation overview provides wrong information
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: SUSE LINUX 10.0
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Update Problems (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 3
Hardware: Other All
: P5 - None : Normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Andres
QA Contact: Klaus Kämpf
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-26 09:53 UTC by Berthold Gunreben
Modified: 2006-02-14 10:37 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments
yast2 update information (87.21 KB, image/png)
2005-08-26 09:53 UTC, Berthold Gunreben
Details
/var/log/YaST2 tar file (606.38 KB, application/x-tbz)
2005-08-26 12:36 UTC, Berthold Gunreben
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Berthold Gunreben 2005-08-26 09:53:00 UTC
when doing an update, packages tells me (sorry in german) 
 
* Zu aktualisierende Pakete: 0 
* Zu installierende neue Pakete: 697 
* Zu entfernende Pakete: 0 
 
what is obviously wrong. Most packages should just be updated, and it tells 
that it would just install new packages. 
 
Adding screenshot...
Comment 1 Berthold Gunreben 2005-08-26 09:53:49 UTC
Created attachment 47735 [details]
yast2 update information
Comment 2 Jiri Srain 2005-08-26 11:38:59 UTC
Please, add the log. 
Comment 3 Berthold Gunreben 2005-08-26 11:58:57 UTC
which one? /var/lib/YaST2 is 14MB big. 
Comment 4 Jiri Srain 2005-08-26 12:02:38 UTC
Tar and compress it all, I can't tell without looking inside them. 
Comment 5 Berthold Gunreben 2005-08-26 12:36:05 UTC
Created attachment 47763 [details]
/var/log/YaST2 tar file
Comment 6 Jiri Srain 2005-08-26 12:56:54 UTC
Michael, the  
  
Pkg::GetPackages (`installed, true)  
  
function returned empty list (according to the log, see y2log-1, grep for  
'Selected.*Install'. I cannot reproduce it on my system. 
  
Amy idea why? I haven't found any error regarding target initialization...  
Comment 7 Berthold Gunreben 2005-08-26 13:18:53 UTC
I just found, that there are packages that are no more in the rpm database. 
For example the package gbuffy: 
 
rpm -qf $(which gbuffy) 
file /usr/bin/gbuffy is not owned by any package 
 
I guess, that only the default packages have been updated, and all others are 
still there in an old version. 
 
machine is roth.suse.de 
Comment 8 Berthold Gunreben 2006-02-14 10:37:06 UTC
I guess that there has been a corrupt rpm database. This is not reproduceable anymore.