Bug 113339 - Acoustic and Powersave schemes are identical
Summary: Acoustic and Powersave schemes are identical
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SUSE LINUX 10.0
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Mobile Devices (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 3
Hardware: Other All
: P4 - Low : Minor
Target Milestone: SUSE Linux 10.1
Assignee: Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-26 14:52 UTC by Takashi Iwai
Modified: 2007-06-05 11:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Takashi Iwai 2005-08-26 14:52:26 UTC
All the values set in Acoustic and Powersave schemes are identical.
Comment 1 Stefan Behlert 2005-08-26 15:00:09 UTC
Holger, Thomas, any reason besides 'historical changes' for this?  
Comment 2 Danny Al-Gaaf 2005-08-26 15:39:00 UTC
This is only historical reasons. The scheme was in the past to optimize your 
machine to run as quiet as possible. But since we no longer touch the harddisk 
settings the scheme is proper no longer needed.

You can remove the scheme with yast or directly by deleting in /etc/sysconfig/
powersave/
Comment 3 Takashi Iwai 2005-08-26 15:58:38 UTC
Then wouldn't be better to remove one from the default in order to avoid confusion?
Comment 4 Danny Al-Gaaf 2005-08-26 16:09:30 UTC
Maybe for 10.1 because I think this is already to late to change the 
documentation of kpowersave and powersave
Comment 5 Holger Macht 2005-08-31 10:09:55 UTC
The only difference between the two schemes are that in powersave the brightness
of the display is set to medium and with acoustic it remains untouched.

So I also think we should remove acoustic scheme _after_ 10.1 as long as there
are no new acoustic features which could be integrated.
Comment 6 Holger Macht 2005-08-31 10:10:53 UTC
I ment after 10.0, of course.
Comment 7 Holger Macht 2005-09-28 07:39:10 UTC
Maybe we add the adjustment for harddisk settings again in acoustic scheme. We
had enourmous problems with one machine with that. If we do not encounter more
problems, we consider adding disk settings again.
Comment 8 Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2005-09-28 08:55:13 UTC
i'll take this one, we'll probably keep the acoustic profile but actually change
some settings so that it is different from the powersave setting.
Comment 9 Stefan Behlert 2005-12-02 12:25:37 UTC
I think Holger has made some cleaning here?
Comment 10 Holger Macht 2005-12-07 07:18:13 UTC
Not yet, but this week I will merge the Acoustic scheme with the new hot AggressivePowersave scheme to a new AdvancedPowersave scheme. Assigning to me...
Comment 11 Holger Macht 2005-12-23 09:11:34 UTC
After more discussions and a new feature which exactly fits into the Acoustic scheme we agreed on keeping it. Additionally, we will have a new scheme AdvancedPowersave which will get a very special handling in our clients.

Seife, do you want to reenable additional harddisk settings in the Acoustic scheme? Because of many upcoming questions about harddisk settings, I would say 'yes'. Maybe we should use only slight settings for that.
Comment 12 Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2005-12-23 11:38:12 UTC
yes. I also wanted to untangle the disk settings from the laptop-mode etc. I will do this and then set reasonable harddisk settings in the different schemes.
Comment 13 Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2006-02-05 10:44:49 UTC
the acoustic scheme now has the following differences:

-DISK_ACOUSTIC="performance"
+DISK_ACOUSTIC="quiet"
-DISPLAY_BRIGHTNESS="med"
+DISPLAY_BRIGHTNESS="ignore"

and we reenabled disk settings per default again. Although the difference is very small - the acoustic scheme actually is different again :-)