Bug 114018 - Suspend to disk over sleeping-mode-key starts only after pressing button twice
Summary: Suspend to disk over sleeping-mode-key starts only after pressing button twice
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 61106
Alias: None
Product: SUSE LINUX 10.0
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Kernel (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 3
Hardware: HP All
: P5 - None : Minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Thomas Renninger
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-30 03:43 UTC by Ulrich Lange
Modified: 2005-08-31 10:30 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ulrich Lange 2005-08-30 03:43:51 UTC 
HW: HP Omnibook 6100, 1 GHz, 768 MB RAM

W2k was installed before and I could start the suspend-to-disk with one klick on
the sleeping-mode-key. There was no limit and no rule. Klick and suspend! That´s it.
Now I have to klick twice and it works only if I click the second time after
aprox. 8-10 sec.
That´s confusing. The normal-user-feeling could be, the key or the function is
not working.
It should be work with one key-press and staight.
Comment 1 Olaf Kirch 2005-08-30 09:19:08 UTC 
Timo, would that be fixed by the acpi patches we merged for beta4?
Comment 2 Timo Hoenig 2005-08-30 09:26:34 UTC 
No.

The hotkeys of HP Omnibooks can be activatd using omke (http://sourceforge.net/projects/omke). 
We do not ship this driver (does not work reliably, driver does not unload).

The omle project looks very inactive and not maintained since recent HP laptops are not supported.
Comment 3 Timo Hoenig 2005-08-30 09:30:25 UTC 
After re-reading the original bug report the discussed button with the delay seems to be a regular 
ACPI power button. This button should be supported by button.c and not any specific ACPI driver.

Thomas, do we have other reports? Perhaps some EC burst issue?
Comment 4 Thomas Renninger 2005-08-31 10:30:11 UTC 
This issue was once fixed by the ec_burst mode.
However it seems as if they modified it that way that it also has this bug.
Will mark it as duplicate and reopen the other one ...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 61106 ***