Bug 114030 - glibc/ld- versions
Summary: glibc/ld- versions
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: SUSE LINUX 10.0
Classification: openSUSE
Component: AppArmor (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 3
Hardware: Other All
: P5 - None : Normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Seth R Arnold
QA Contact: Keiran Haggerty
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-30 07:26 UTC by Andreas Jaeger
Modified: 2005-09-08 04:48 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andreas Jaeger 2005-08-30 07:26:57 UTC 
It seems to me that ld-lsb.so.2 and ld-lsb.so.3 are missing in the list.

Also, there are far too many glibc versions handled.  Ok, they do not cost us
anything but I would remove some really old versions if possible.
Comment 1 Dominic W Reynolds 2005-08-31 03:19:12 UTC 
Seth: can we add these profiles to the default ld-<SPLAT> set?
Comment 2 Seth R Arnold 2005-08-31 05:44:55 UTC 
Andreas, are there platforms where ld-lsb.so.2 and ld-lsb.so.3 aren't symlinks?
AppArmor doesn't use the symlink name when deciding which profile to apply, so
unless they aren't symlinks somewhere, those profiles would never be applied.

Removing the older loaders is a good idea. 80+ profiles loaded seems a bit silly
when so many are blank. :)

Thanks
Comment 3 Andreas Jaeger 2005-08-31 06:29:02 UTC 
There're current no platforms where ld-lsb.so.2 is not a symlink but this is an
implementation detail that might change.