Bug 114291 - Unresolved dependencies when choosing the GNOME pattern
Summary: Unresolved dependencies when choosing the GNOME pattern
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SUSE LINUX 10.0
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Installation (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 3
Hardware: Other All
: P5 - None : Normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Cornelius Schumacher
QA Contact: Klaus Kämpf
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-30 23:52 UTC by Magnus Boman
Modified: 2007-02-11 23:02 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Log files attached as requested (154.97 KB, application/x-compressed-tar)
2005-08-31 23:22 UTC, Magnus Boman 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Magnus Boman 2005-08-30 23:52:40 UTC 
When selecting the GNOME pattern during installation, the message "Cannot solve
dependencies automatically. Manual intervention required" comes up.
The conflicts are on suse_help_viewer and susehelp 2005.08.01-02
Comment 1 Arvin Schnell 2005-08-31 08:03:32 UTC 
Please provide YaST2 logs of installation, see:
http://www.opensuse.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting_FAQ#YaST
Comment 2 Magnus Boman 2005-08-31 23:22:00 UTC 
Created attachment 48396 [details]
Log files attached as requested
Comment 3 Lukas Ocilka 2005-09-02 10:20:47 UTC 
2 packages failed
Name: suse_help_viewer(*)
Edition: EDITION-UNSPEC
Referers: susehelp-2005.08.01-2 requires suse_help_viewer
Alternatives: apache2(D), kdebase3-SuSE(D)
Remove-Referers: susehelp_en, susehelp

Name: susehelp
Edition: 2005.08.01-2
Inconsistent: susehelp-2005.08.01-2 requires suse_help_viewer
Unresolvable: susehelp-2005.08.01-2 requires suse_help_viewer
Comment 4 Magnus Boman 2005-12-03 22:12:01 UTC 
This one was fixed and could probably be closed
Comment 5 Magnus Boman 2006-05-08 07:08:21 UTC 
Ping...
Comment 6 Magnus Boman 2006-06-07 03:10:32 UTC 
Comment#4 is still valid!
Comment 7 Magnus Boman 2007-02-11 23:02:46 UTC 
This has been fixed.