Bugzilla – Bug 115088
Summaries/Descriptions of many-many rpm packages have typos.
Last modified: 2005-09-05 12:56:50 UTC
A single file would be attached, showing quite a lot of typos in various packages, based on the "packages.en" file. In its present format it's more or less useless, but I decided NOT to report all of this stuff AGAIN, separately for each package ;) Yeah, AGAIN means, that many of them were reported already. (Remark: there could be few extra mistakes introduced by my quick-script, caused by some extra chars left in the file....) Ps. To check my comments particularly to the admin/user-guide packages, please check #115050.
Created attachment 48666 [details] The .diff file I promised (packages.en)
Thanks for the corrections, but could you please rediff with something like: diff -U10 packages.old packages.new To make it possible to detect the names of the packages that have typos corrected.
I'm sorry, I had no idea, how I should send you all of these data. Even, that it's still not "perfect", as suggested, I did now balazs@khazad-dum:~/MyTemp> diff -U10 packages.en.old packages.en.new > packages.en.diff balazs@khazad-dum:~/MyTemp> bzip2 packages.en.diff where the 'packages.en.old' is the original 'packages.en' of beta4 and 'packages.en.new' is my updated variant. Now I attach only the file resulted of the above two commands, but in case it's needed, could provide you 'packages.en.new' as well...
Created attachment 48724 [details] The promised .diff file [prepared by -U10]
No problem, this one looks much better. For some packages we would still need to check packages.en, but that's just fine.
Created attachment 48725 [details] The (complete AND) corrected 'packages.en' file of beta4...
Finally done (updated in PDB)!