Bug 115329 - Beagle fails on first run of SMP machine
Summary: Beagle fails on first run of SMP machine
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SUSE LINUX 10.0
Classification: openSUSE
Component: GNOME (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 4
Hardware: x86-64 All
: P5 - None : Major
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sebastien Pouliot
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-09-05 17:14 UTC by JP Rosevear
Modified: 2006-05-12 16:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Found By: Other
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Log of exception in system call (4.85 KB, text/plain)
2005-09-05 17:15 UTC, JP Rosevear 		Details
Another exception on SMP machine (2.36 KB, text/x-log)
2005-09-05 17:32 UTC, JP Rosevear 		Details
beagle-lib64.patch (1.27 KB, patch)
2005-09-30 12:30 UTC, Stanislav Brabec 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description JP Rosevear 2005-09-05 17:14:29 UTC 
If I remove ~/.beagle I see to be able to repeat every time.  Can't seem to
replicate if I use the non-SMP kernel.
Comment 1 JP Rosevear 2005-09-05 17:15:10 UTC 
Created attachment 48832 [details]
Log of exception in system call
Comment 2 JP Rosevear 2005-09-05 17:30:46 UTC 
Another exception thats a bit more repeatable.  Adding mono team.
Comment 3 JP Rosevear 2005-09-05 17:32:12 UTC 
Created attachment 48839 [details]
Another exception on SMP machine
Comment 4 Michael Gross 2005-09-06 10:18:43 UTC 
Reducing severity to `major'.
Comment 5 Joe Shaw 2005-09-07 20:37:28 UTC 
Doesn't happen on my SMP i686; setting the hardware to x86-64
Comment 6 Stanislav Brabec 2005-09-30 12:30:12 UTC 
Created attachment 51239 [details]
beagle-lib64.patch

Ugly hack, which makes beagle running on AMD64. For 10.0 it is a minimal fix I
plan to submit with security fix of bug 118188. For next version, platform
independend fix would be needed.
Comment 7 Stanislav Brabec 2005-09-30 12:32:36 UTC 
To Andreas Jaeger: If you don't plan better YOU update for 10.0, I can put this
trivial hack for x86_64 build altogether with upper mentioned security fix.

After this patch, beagle at least basically works on my AMD64.
Comment 8 Andreas Jaeger 2005-09-30 12:47:32 UTC 
There is already the following swamp ID for beagle: Maintenance-Tracker-2354.

We should merge these and the security ones and just release one.

Gary, please take care of this.
Comment 9 JP Rosevear 2005-09-30 14:25:07 UTC 
Its possible this patch, while it looks correct, may not actually fix this
particular bug.  Needs re-testing to confirm.
Comment 10 Stanislav Brabec 2005-09-30 14:43:38 UTC 
Patch submitted for 9.3, 10.0 and STABLE altogether with patch for bug 118188.
Other patches will be applied later on top of these two patches.

But yes, maybe it does not actually fix problem reported in this bug. Keeping
the bug opened.
Comment 11 Joe Shaw 2006-02-02 17:34:32 UTC 
Is this patch still necessary?  libdir should be correctly set by the spec file and configure.
Comment 12 Stanislav Brabec 2006-02-20 14:11:36 UTC 
No. The lib64 patch is obsolete and I am removing it. Files beagle-0.0.pc and beagle-daemon.pc are now generated.

These two files (with invalid contents) should even not be a part of beagle tarball. But this is only a minor issue.

Feel free to close if the original bug report is fixed.
Comment 13 Joe Shaw 2006-05-12 16:45:21 UTC 
Closing this.