Bug 115949 - Unable to remove song from library
Summary: Unable to remove song from library
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 116164
: 115938 (view as bug list)
Alias: None
Product: SUSE LINUX 10.0
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Mono (show other bugs)
Version: RC 1
Hardware: i386 SUSE Other
: P5 - None : Critical
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Aaron Bockover
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-09-08 18:31 UTC by Glen Christensen
Modified: 2008-07-17 13:29 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Found By: System Test
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Glen Christensen 2005-09-08 18:31:31 UTC
I attempted to remove a song from a library, by right clicking on the song title
and selecting remove and received this:

Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to
an instance of an object
in <0x00000> <unknown method>
in (wrapper managed-to-native) GLib.Signal:g_signal_get_invocation_hint (intptr)
in <0x0001c> GLib.Signal:get_Handler ()
in <0x00061> GLib.Signal:voidObjectCallback (IntPtr handle, IntPtr gch)
in (wrapper native-to-managed) GLib.Signal:voidObjectCallback (intptr,intptr)
in <0x00000> <unknown method>
in (wrapper managed-to-native) Gtk.Object:gtk_object_destroy (intptr)
in <0x00017> Gtk.Object:Destroy ()
in <0x0000a> Gtk.Widget:Destroy ()
in <0x00140> Banshee.PlayerUI:OnItemRemoveActivate (System.Object o,
System.EventArgs args)
in (wrapper delegate-invoke)
System.MulticastDelegate:invoke_void_object_EventArgs (object,System.EventArgs)
in <0x00096> GLib.Signal:voidObjectCallback (IntPtr handle, IntPtr gch)
in (wrapper native-to-managed) GLib.Signal:voidObjectCallback (intptr,intptr)
in <0x00000> <unknown method>
in (wrapper managed-to-native) Gtk.Application:gtk_main ()
in <0x00007> Gtk.Application:Run ()
in <0x0036f> Banshee.PlayerUI:.ctor ()
in <0x0029a> Banshee.BansheeEntry:Main (System.String[] args)
Comment 1 JP Rosevear 2005-09-09 12:49:43 UTC
Glen could you rpm -ql banshee | grep config and attach the output of those files?

Also try install glib2-devel, I think that will solve the issue.
Comment 2 Glen Christensen 2005-09-09 13:52:55 UTC
# cat /usr/lib/banshee/banshee.exe.config
<configuration>
        <dllmap dll="libglib-2.0.so" target="libglib-2.0.so.0" />
        <dllmap dll="libgobject-2.0-0.dll" target="libgobject-2.0.so.0" />
        <dllmap dll="libbonobo-2.so" target="libbonobo-2.so.0" />
        <dllmap dll="libbanshee" target="/usr/lib/banshee/libbanshee.so" />
</configuration>

# cat /usr/lib/banshee/burn-sharp.dll.config
<configuration>
        <dllmap dll="libnautilus-burn" target="libnautilus-burn.so.2" />
        <dllmap dll="libnautilusburnglue"
target="/usr/lib/banshee/libnautilusburnglue.so" />
</configuration>

# cat /usr/lib/banshee/ipod-sharp.dll.config
<configuration>
        <dllmap dll="ipoddevice" target="libipoddevice.so.0.0.0" />
        <dllmap dll="libdbus-1" target="libdbus-1.so.1" />
        <dllmap dll="libhal" target="libhal.so.1" />
</configuration>
Comment 3 Glen Christensen 2005-09-09 13:56:57 UTC
glib2-devel is already installed:
# rpm -qa | grep -i glib2-devel
glib2-devel-2.8.1-3
Comment 4 Dan Winship 2005-09-09 15:09:10 UTC
mkestner says this looks just like a bug that got fixed in gtk-sharp 2.3.91
Comment 5 Wade Berrier 2005-09-09 15:18:33 UTC
Permission to update gtk-sharp to 2.3.91?
Comment 6 Glen Christensen 2005-09-09 15:20:39 UTC
Okay, RC1 is using gtk-sharp-1.0.10-5
Comment 7 Dan Winship 2005-09-09 15:34:16 UTC
*** Bug 115938 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Andreas Jaeger 2005-09-09 17:08:40 UTC
2.3.91?  No.  We're using 1.0.10 and such an upgrade is not possible.  Please
extract the single patch that solves this and make a backport.
Comment 9 Dan Winship 2005-09-09 19:01:49 UTC
Sorry, we're talking about gtk-sharp2, not gtk-sharp. But anyway, it turns
out to be a different bug from the one Mike thought it was anyway.
Comment 10 Mark Gordon 2005-09-09 22:42:56 UTC
116164 again.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 116164 ***