Bug 1211862 - u-boot misses patches in Factory
Summary: u-boot misses patches in Factory
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Granite
Classification: SUSE ALP - SUSE Adaptable Linux Platform
Component: Boot (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other Other
: P1 - Urgent : Normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Guilherme Moro
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-05-31 11:49 UTC by Jiri Srain
Modified: 2023-07-20 09:34 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jiri Srain 2023-05-31 11:49:09 UTC
Submission to IBS did not get through, because of 

/work/src/done/SLE-ALP-SR-ST-1/u-boot was not checked in by dmach for the following reasons:
(submitrequest 300025 on https://build.suse.de)
dmach wrote (300025)
CONFIG_CMD_BTRFS=y is no longer set in couple places when comparing to SP5. Is this expected?
I ran: iosc rdiff {SUSE:SLE-15-SP5:GA,openSUSE.org:opensuse:Factory}/u-boot

Please, apply the missing patches to Factory; when submitting to Factory, please, submit at the same time to build.suse.de: SUSE:ALP:Source:Standard:1.0
Comment 1 Jiri Srain 2023-05-31 11:50:15 UTC
Be aware that it is essential for having aarch64 build for ALP Milestone1 next week.
Comment 2 Miroslav Beneš 2023-05-31 13:19:32 UTC
Matthias, could you a have look, please? My understanding is that you have maintained SLE's side of u-boot.
Comment 3 Matthias Brugger 2023-06-01 07:38:36 UTC
I have double checked and BTRFS is enabled. Actually I suppose there is a problem in the script because from my understanding
iosc rdiff {SUSE:SLE-15-SP5:GA,openSUSE.org:openSUSE:Factory}/u-boot

I only found entries like
> ^\ -CONFIG_CMD_BTRFS=y 
which is just context in a patch. I would expected something like
> ^+-CONFIG_CMD_BTRFS=y
Which would mean we are deleting line CONFIG_CMD_BTRFS=y in a patch in Factory.

I'm inclined to close this bug as worksforme
Comment 4 Ivan Ivanov 2023-07-18 10:52:03 UTC
Maybe is time to close this?
Comment 5 Matthias Brugger 2023-07-20 09:34:43 UTC
(In reply to Ivan Ivanov from comment #4)
> Maybe is time to close this?

Submit got accpeted as is.